Academic Integrity: tutoring, explanations, and feedback — we don’t complete graded work or submit on a student’s behalf.

Match the name of the systems trap with its description. competing reinforcing l

ID: 422671 • Letter: M

Question

Match the name of the systems trap with its description.

competing reinforcing loops that build exponentially

applying a solution to the system that treats the symptom without addressing the underlying problem

growing, shared, erodible environment with weak feedback loops to users

reinforcing feedback loop rewarding the competition’s winner

designing the system toward the wrong purpose, leading to confusion of effort and result

few system changes due to subsystems with differing/competing goals

appearing to meet goals while engaging in self-organizing evasive behavior

eroding, changing standards where the perceived state of system influences desired the state

shifting the burden to the intervenor

success to the successful

seeking the wrong goal

tragedy of the commons

policy resistance

drift to low performance

escalation

rule beating

5 points

Question 2

Match the name of the systems trap with its solution/way out.

education of users, strengthening feedback loops, or regulation of resource

positive use of self-organizing capabilities and creativity

harmonization of goals with subsystems working toward overarching system goals

addressing the long-term solution rather than the short-term reliefs

refusal to compete or negotiation of new systems with balancing loops

focus on best past performances and maintenance of absolute standards

defining system purpose accurately and completely, specifying the correct indicators to reflect and measure that purpose

implementation of equalizing mechanisms such as diversification or adjusting advantages

success to the successful

seeking the wrong goal

tragedy of the commons

policy resistance

rule beating

drift to low performance

escalation

shifting the burden to the intervenor

-A.B.C.D.E.F.G.H.

competing reinforcing loops that build exponentially

-A.B.C.D.E.F.G.H.

applying a solution to the system that treats the symptom without addressing the underlying problem

-A.B.C.D.E.F.G.H.

growing, shared, erodible environment with weak feedback loops to users

-A.B.C.D.E.F.G.H.

reinforcing feedback loop rewarding the competition’s winner

-A.B.C.D.E.F.G.H.

designing the system toward the wrong purpose, leading to confusion of effort and result

-A.B.C.D.E.F.G.H.

few system changes due to subsystems with differing/competing goals

-A.B.C.D.E.F.G.H.

appearing to meet goals while engaging in self-organizing evasive behavior

-A.B.C.D.E.F.G.H.

eroding, changing standards where the perceived state of system influences desired the state

A.

shifting the burden to the intervenor

B.

success to the successful

C.

seeking the wrong goal

D.

tragedy of the commons

E.

policy resistance

F.

drift to low performance

G.

escalation

H.

rule beating

Explanation / Answer

1.

(1) G Escalation trap is one actor influecing other actor exponentially and thus competing reinforcing loops build exponentially.

(2) A. Shifting the Burden to the Intervenor Trap arise when a solution to a systemic problem reduces (or disguises) the symptoms, but does nothing to solve the underlying problem.

(3) D Tragedy of the Commons is a trap where shared-resource system where individual users acting independently according to their own self-interest behave contrary to the common good of all users by depleting or spoiling that resource through their collective action. Thus there is growing, shared, erodible environment with weak feedback loops to users.

(4) B Success to the Successful trap the demands made by competing groups for a common resource are linked by two reinforcing loops and thusreinforcing feedback loop rewarding the competition’s winner

(5) C Seeking the Wrong Goal trap is If the goal is defined badly, if it doesn't measure what it's supposed to measure, if it doesn't reflect the real purpose it is wrong since inception.

(6) H Rule Beating --perverse behavior that gives the appearance of obeying the rules or achieving the goals, but that actually distorts the system and thus few system changes due to subsystems with differing/competing goals.

(7) E Policy Resistance happens when each participant in the system starts behaving individually and not taking it collectively thus appearing to meet goals while engaging in self-organizing evasive behavior.

(8) F Drift to low performance is allowing performance standards to be influenced by past performance, especially if there is a negative bias in perceiving past performance, sets up a reinforcing feedback loop of eroding goals that sets a system drifting toward low performance. Thus eroding, changing standards where the perceived state of system influences desired the state.

2.

(1) C Tragedy of the Commons (trap where shared-resource system where individual users acting independently according to their own self-interest behave contrary to the common good of all users by depleting or spoiling that resource through their collective action) is solved by education of users, strengthening feedback loops, or regulation of resource

(2) D Policy Resistance (when each participant in the system starts behaving individually and not taking it collectively thus appearing to meet goals while engaging in self-organizing evasive behavior) can be resolved by positive use of self-organizing capabilities and creativity

(3) E Rules beating (perverse behavior that gives the appearance of obeying the rules or achieving the goals, but that actually distorts the system) can be solved by harmonization of goals with subsystems working toward overarching system goals.

(4) H Shifting the Burden to the Intervenor (Trap arise when a solution to a systemic problem reduces (or disguises) the symptoms, but does nothing to solve the underlying problem) and thus is solved by addressing the long-term solution rather than the short-term reliefs.

(5) G Escalation (trap is one actor influecing other actor exponentially and thus competing reinforcing loops build exponentially) can be solved by refusal to compete or negotiation of new systems with balancing loops

(6) A Success to the Successful (trap the demands made by competing groups for a common resource are linked by two reinforcing loops and thusreinforcing feedback loop rewarding the competition’s winner )and hence by focus on best past performances and maintenance of absolute standards

(7) B Seeking the Wrong Goal (trap is If the goal is defined badly, if it doesn't measure what it's supposed to measure, if it doesn't reflect the real purpose it is wrong since inception) can be resolved by defining system purpose accurately and completely, specifying the correct indicators to reflect and measure that purpose

(8) F Drift to Low Performance (Drift to low performance is allowing performance standards to be influenced by past performance, especially if there is a negative bias in perceiving past performance, sets up a reinforcing feedback loop of eroding goals that sets a system drifting toward low performance) can be resolved by focus on best past performances and maintenance of absolute standard.

Hire Me For All Your Tutoring Needs
Integrity-first tutoring: clear explanations, guidance, and feedback.
Drop an Email at
drjack9650@gmail.com
Chat Now And Get Quote