School Law ISBN: 9780133905427 Can you please give me some key take aways from t

Question

School Law ISBN: 9780133905427

Can you please give me some key take aways from this article?

Equity relates to fairness and suggests that all communities are taxed at similar rates and have equal access to similar amounts of money for each student. In districts where wealth disparities exist, most states attempt to subsidize local effort to make wealthy and poor districts more equal. On page 338 in the textbook, it states that "the state may collect tax funds from wealthy school districts and redistribute them to poorer districts to have a measure of equity." Adequacy focuses on a standard for a minimal level of funding needed for every school to provide an education to its students. This education would be considered adequate, not excellent. Adequate educations are provided by ensuring that schools receive a set amount of money for each student in the district to be used to educate each student.

Taxes and how funds are distributed are important challenges to school funding. In the case of Serrano v. Priest, the court's basic view was that the quality of a child's education should not be a function of the wealth of the district in which the child lives. These challenges have produced ways to collect and distribute funds to create a more adequate education for students in poor districts and to help address wealth disparity. Large gaps in wealth and higher taxes can cause wealthier districts to maintain a good education, while districts within the same state suffer due to lack of funds being collected to support local education.

Property tax is the most common source of local funding for schools. It's important because it's the major source of funding for local schools and is based on property and personal taxes. I believe this is important because this can create great financial deficits in poorer districts in comparison to wealthier districts.  

In the Rodriguez case, a district court found that the TX finance system was unconstitutional under the equal protection clause of the 14th Amendment. However, the Supreme Court reversed that ruling and found that it was not unconstitutional. The Rodriguez case also moved finance litigation from federal courts to state courts. Post-Rodriguez cases were influential in presenting that there are equality differences amongst rich and poor groups of students within districts. In the Williams v. California and CFE v. State of New York cases, a decision was made that confirmed poor students were not receiving equal education opportunities. Affluent districts were getting resources that poor districts were not, and the courts found that the states were required by the constitution to provide a sound, basic education. These cases brought light to educational gaps within districts that are a result of inequality of education due to finances.

Explanation / Answer

After reading the case , one can take away the following key points:

1) In the Williams v. California and CFE v. State of New York cases, a decision was made that confirmed poor students were not receiving equal education opportunities.

2) An overall educational gaps are found within the districts that are a result of inequality of education due to lack of adequate finances.

3) Property tax is the most common source of local funding for schools.

4) In a judgement , it was found that the TX finance system was unconstitutional under the equal protection clause of the 14th Amendment.

Related Questions

Navigate

• Browse (All)
• Browse S
• Subjects

Integrity-first tutoring: explanations and feedback only — we do not complete graded work. Learn more.