Trans Absorb LnAbsorb 1/Absorb Scatter Blank 0.0000 100.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.000
ID: 972024 • Letter: T
Question
Trans Absorb LnAbsorb 1/Absorb Scatter Blank 0.0000 100.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0050 99.8467 0.0007 7.3136 1500.540 0.0000 0.0250 94.7326 0.0235 -3.7507 42.5520 0.0000 0.0500 87.5891 0.0576 -2.8551 17.3762 0.0000 0.1400 67.6288 0.1699 -1.7727 5.8869 0.0000 0.2750 46.6312 0.3313 -1.1047 3.01820.0000 pond0.017895.6977 0.01913.9581 52.3597 0.0000 pond2 0.0088 98.1239 0.0082 4.8006 121.5795 0.0000 pond30.0065 98.7553 0.0054-5.2141 183.8373 0.0000 Tap1 0.5533 21.3403 0.6708 0.3993 1.4908 0.0000 Tap2 0.5621 20.8172 0.68160.3833 1.4672 0.0000 Tap3 0.5645 20.6819 0.6844-0.3792 1.46110.0000 Bay1 0.0021 100.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Bay2 0.0021 100.0000 0.00000.00000.0000 39.0000 Bay3 0.0021 100.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 35.0000 Sample Conc 2 4 5 witriteExplanation / Answer
In the column concentration I am assuming you have 3 types of water from where you measured nitrite.
The calibration curve seems rigth, you could write about it
About the sample readings the absorbance for the samples Tap1, Tap2, Tap3, got out of the calibration curve, you can discuss the error of measuring out of the curve.
You can analyze the difference in concentration, you could talk about the similar measurements in each type of water or sample,
Dependig on the objectives you can describe why the difference in concentration for each source of water.
The table has a lot of numbers, so try to focus on the concentration readings.
Related Questions
drjack9650@gmail.com
Navigate
Integrity-first tutoring: explanations and feedback only — we do not complete graded work. Learn more.