Briefly identify the range of leadership styles utilized in the Vroom–Jago time-

Question

Explanation / Answer

Understanding the Model

When you sit down to make a decision, your style, and the degree of participation you need to get from your team, are affected by three main factors:

• Decision Quality – how important is it to come up with the "right" solution? The higher the quality of the decision needed, the more you should involve other people in the decision.

• Subordinate Commitment – how important is it that your team and others buy into the decision? When teammates need to embrace the decision you should increase the participation levels.

• Time Constraints – How much time do you have to make the decision? The more time you have, the more you have the luxury of including others, and of using the decision as an opportunity for teambuilding.

Specific Leadership Styles

The way that these factors impact on you helps you determine the best leadership and decision-making style to use. Vroom-Jago distinguishes three styles of leadership, and five different processes of decision-making that you can consider using:

Style:

Autocratic – you make the decision and inform others of it.

There are two separate processes for decision making in an autocratic style:

Processes:

Autocratic 1(A1) – you use the information you already have and make the decision

Autocratic 2 (A2) – you ask team members for specific information and once you have it, you make the decision. Here you don't necessarily tell them what the information is needed for.

Style:

Consultative – you gather information from the team and other and then make the decision.

Processes:

Consultative 1 (C1) – you inform team members of what you're doing and may individually ask opinions, however, the group is not brought together for discussion. You make the decision.

Consultative 2 (C2) – you are responsible for making the decision, however, you get together as a group to discuss the situation, hear other perspectives, and solicit suggestions.

Style:

Collaborative – you and your team work together to reach a consensus.

Process:

Group (G2) – The team makes a decision together. Your role is mostly facilitative and you help the team come to a final decision that everyone agrees on.

This is a useful model, but it's quite complex and long-winded. Use it in new situations, or in ones which have unusual characteristics: Using it, you'll quickly get an feel for the right approach to use in more usual circumstances.

To determine which of these styles and processes is most appropriate, there is a series of yes/no questions that you ask yourself about the situation, and building a decision tree based on the responses. There are seven questions in total.

These are:

1. Is the technical quality of the decision very important? Meaning, are the consequences of failure significant?

2. Does a successful outcome depend on your team members' commitment to the decision? Must there be buy-in for the solution to work?

3. Do you have sufficient information to be able to make the decision on your own?

4. Is the problem well-structured so that you can easily understand what needs to be addressed and what defines a good solution?

5. Are you reasonably sure that your team will accept your decision even if you make it yourself?

6. Are the goals of the team consistent with the goals the organization has set to define a successful solution?

7. Will there likely be conflict among the team as to which solution is best?

In general, a consultative or collaborative style is most appropriate when:

• You need information from others to solve a problem.

• The problem definition isn't clear.

• Team members' buy-in to the decision is important.

• You have enough time to manage a group decision.

An autocratic style is most efficient when:

• You have more expertise on the subject than others.

• You are confident about acting alone.

• The team will accept your decision.

• There is little time available.

Key Points

The underlying assumption of the Vroom-Yetton-Jago Decision Models is that no one leadership style or decision making process fits all situations.

By analyzing the situation and evaluating the problem based on time, team buy-in, and decision quality, a conclusion about which style best fits the situation can be made. The model defines a very logical approach to which style to adopt and is useful for managers and leaders who are trying to balance the benefits of participative management with the need to make decisions effectively.

Related Questions

Navigate

• Browse (All)
• Browse B
• Subjects

Integrity-first tutoring: explanations and feedback only — we do not complete graded work. Learn more.