CASE STUDY: BITTORRENT HARVARD BUSINESS REVIEW Question 01: Why haven’t the reco

Question

CASE STUDY: BITTORRENT HARVARD BUSINESS REVIEW

Question 01: Why haven’t the record companies or film studios tried to shut down the main BitTorrent site?

Question 02: What could Napster, Hummer Winblad, and Grokster have done to have avoided liability, or to have secured a stronger position with respect to the legal actions that unfolded?

Questiion 03: If you were David Chao of DCM, would you invest in BitTorrent? Why or why not?

Question 04: Does Google’s Library Search Project or its image search feature violate the rights of the copyright holders of the content Google digitizes? If you were CEO of Google, what assurance would you want from the counsel before proceeding?

Explanation / Answer

1) Although Bittorrent has been related with online robbery, through different document sharing alternatives that utilization the organizations innovation, I think the record organizations are keener on helping craftsmen profit for their work in the long haul. Since however record deals are a major piece of the craftsmen pay, their image is more essential. I think if Bittorrent adjusted their agreement with record organizations and film studios to additionally profit specialists, it would make them more averse to sue.

2) with a specific end goal to maintain a strategic distance from obligation for this situation, you need to make it basic that you don't benefit from the optional copyright encroachment of your client base.

3) I for one would not put resources into Bittorrent if I were David Chao, as I trust it would negatively affect DCM, and its investors.

Related Questions

Navigate

• Browse (All)
• Browse C
• Subjects

Integrity-first tutoring: explanations and feedback only — we do not complete graded work. Learn more.