Defendant Woodson is an African-American male accused of murdering a white femal

Question

Defendant Woodson is an African-American male accused of murdering a white female in an apartment burglary. During the jury selection process, Prosecutor Forbes exercises only two peremptory challenges, excusing from service the only two African-Americans in the jury. An all-white jury is eventually empanelled, and Defendant Woodson is convicted of first-degree murder, with life imprisonment imposed as punishment.

After the jury verdict is announced, Prosecutor Forbes is questioned by the local media concerning his exercise of the peremptory challenges. Prosecutor Forbes explains that race was not a factor in his decision, but that the two potential jurors were excused “because they have facial hair, and as a matter of practice, I do not want individuals with facial hair serving on my jury.” Further, Prosecutor Forbes states “I categorically deny that race played any factor whatsoever in the jury selection process.”

On appeal, should the appellate court: 1) deem Prosecutor Forbes’ actions reversible error, and remand the case to the trial court level to be retried; 2) vacate (nullify) the jury verdict, and dismiss the charges against Defendant Woodson; or

3) allow the conviction to stand? Should prosecutors be allowed to consider race as a factor in the jury selection process? Gender? Age?

Explanation / Answer

In my opinion the court should - 1) deem Prosecutor Forbes’ actions reversible error, and remand the case to the trial court level to be retried.

There are various laws against racial discrimination. It is considered as a offence. "The Civil Rights Act of 1964: Title VII (Equal Employment Opportunities)" prevents discrimination against race, age, gender, colour, national origin etc.

If the jury himself will judge people according to their race then it is very shamefull. Although it is true that Prosecutor Forbes has a right to officially excuse some juror without giving a reason, but still if he would excuse some person because of their race then how would he judge others on the jury. Besides he was giving a lame excuse and was taking an advantage if his legal rights. So, it will be appropriate to deem Prosecutor Forbes' action as remand to the trial court.

Hope this will help :)

Related Questions

Navigate

• Browse (All)
• Browse D
• Subjects

Integrity-first tutoring: explanations and feedback only — we do not complete graded work. Learn more.