1. How has the creation of new and more varied definitions of terrorism helped u
ID: 406413 • Letter: 1
Question
1. How has the creation of new and more varied definitions of terrorism helped us understand the aims, goals, and motivations of terrorists and their groups? Conversely, how has the lack of a finite definition from the United Nations hindered the global dismantling of terrorist organizations and their funding mechanisms?
2. In looking to the future, should the DHS and its agencies be permitted to spy on US citizens without the need for judicial oversight?
1. Modern societies are composed of diverse religious, ethnic, and racial groupings that often seem out of context or not in sync with the ruling structures. Discuss how terrorism has developed to threaten both religious as well as ethnic groupings.
2. We have seen the progress in Homeland Security and now the types of terrorism in play around the world. Does the overall need for society to be protected outweigh individual rights and freedoms with draconian measures enshrined in such legislation as the PATRIOT Act?
Explanation / Answer
Answer-1
Defining any problem makes us to understand it in a better way. And the next step is to find its solution. Successful solution is not possible without understanding the problem completely. That is why problem statement is alsways required and it is crucial for uss to understand it completely.
In case of terrorism defining the various forms amkes us to understand which one is more severy in which part of this world and what is the cause of that nature. This would makes us to tackle this neausense of this world and eradicate it completely from this world.
Lack of definition by UN has made this problem to get unnoticed in major part of the world and making it to grow phenomenoly.
Answer-2
No, Spying on citizens is aginst their freedom. We should not favour such acts as these acts makes the very nature of the freedom gets overruled. We shuold make or rules strong and should not use this way to give judicial oversight.
Answer-1
In the modern era, religious terrorism has increased in its frequency, scale of violence, and global reach. At the same time, a relative decline has occurred in secular terrorism. The old ideologies of class conflict, anticolonial liberation, and secular nationalism have been challenged by a new and vigorous infusion of sectarian ideologies. Grassroots extremist support for religious violence has been most widespread among populations living in repressive societies that do not permit demands for reform or other expressions of dissent.
Answer-2
Many believe that the prevention of terrorist attacks is able to take place without handing sweeping authority to the government to essentially investigate anyone that they see fit. Since there is no way to quantify whether the Patriot Act prevented a follow up attack, these debates will continue to rage on.
When even a citizen’s library records become a matter of government concern, it is important for people who are skeptical about these regulations to have their fears assuaged. However, it became evident to Patriot Act skeptics that they would never have the opportunity to air their grievances. The emotional climate during the Patriot Act’s inception was one of fear and hostility towards different cultures, as opposed to one of understanding.
Related Questions
Navigate
Integrity-first tutoring: explanations and feedback only — we do not complete graded work. Learn more.