Unit II Case Study Read the case study in your textbook on pp.159-161, and prepa
ID: 363438 • Letter: U
Question
Unit II Case Study Read the case study in your textbook on pp.159-161, and prepare an analysis, developing the conclusions, recommendations, and implications. Make sure to answer the following questions in your response: In what ways is illegal immigration an intergovernmental issue? Why has this particular intergovernmental issue become so politically significant in recent years? What are the responsibilities, if any, of the federal government to state and county governments that are struggling to deal with the “costs” of illegal immigration? Your assignment should also meet the following guidelines: A minimum of 600 words Formatted using APA Style Use your own words and include citations for other articles as needed to avoid plagiarism.
Why Illegal Immigration Is an Intergovernmental Mess and Will Remain So A CASE STUDY I would like to get into a heated debate with someone, illegal immigration would be a good topic. In the United States today there are few issues that more emotional reactions than the government's policies for dealing with illegal mmigrants. From border security to the provision of social services to illegal res- there seem to be a countless number of elements to this polarizing issue point of contention within the federal system of government. of illegal immigration issues, it is inevitable that this topic will illustrate As with so many other aspects of public administration, the U.S And as the nation struggles over the illegal immigration quandary, the issue ha With the national, state, and local governments all playing key roles in the man become a perennial agement the complexity of intergovernmental relations in the United States today Constitution says very little about the subject of immigration. While neve mentioning the word "immigration," the Constitution addresses naturalization of citizens in two places: Article I, Section 8, authorizes Congress to "establish a uniform Rule of Naturalization," and the Fourteenth Amendment declares All persons borm or naturalized in the United States.. are citizens of the United States and of the State wherein they reside." With such scant direction from the highest law in the land it has fallen on generations of public official to manage the process by which foreign-born individuals enter into citizenship While the process of a citizen has been ment's auspices, the management of the flow and treatment of those illegally ntering the United States has been much more fragmented. Ports of entry, sing patrols, and customs operations are run by the federal govern- ith penalties such as incarceration carried out by federal authorities. ment, w Although the issue of border security and the prevention of illegal residents from entering the country are the domain of the feds, there is very little satisfac- tion with the way the powers in Washington, D.C., have dealt with the issue. pproximately 11 million Mexico. But other estimates go as high as 20 milion. The situation is To deal with this vast population of illegal immigrants, state and local According to the Pew Hispanic Center, there were a illegal immigrants living in the United States in 2007, with almost 6 in 10 com- so out of control that no one can provide any numbers with certainty. governments have struggled to provide support services. From schools to medical care, illegal immigrants require many of the same services needed legal immigrants and citizens. However, illegals are likely to have paid less in taxes than citizens because of "under the table" employment options which often allow them to work for undocumented and untaxed cash as part of the nation's already vast underground tax-evading economy. In addition their often poor economic conditions, lack of health insurance, and languag barriers require more public social services than those needed by average (continued)Explanation / Answer
don`t think that by closing borders, would control the epidemic as closing borders would create many other problems ,paradoxically make things much worse in the sense that" you can’t get supplies in, you can’t get help in, you can’t get the kinds of things in there that we need to contain the epidemic.”
Despite this, health and development experts are unanimous that a ban on outward air travel would be disastrous. Privately, UN officials warn that such a move could lead to a panicked rush of people across land borders, where unlike air passengers their movements cannot be traced. It could also cause further economic damage to the countries, threatening the civil order essential to fighting the disease.
So if neither exit nor entry screening works, why not simply stop anyone leaving the countries while we get the epidemic under control?
The first reason is that travel bans are unlikely to be very effective. Steep reductions in flights after the 9/11 bombings only delayed the subsequent flu season, and closing borders to the HIV-positive in the 1980s did not slow the HIV pandemic.
In both cases, that was because people carrying the infection still managed to get through, and that is likely now.
Moreover, a travel ban would further reduce commercial flights to the region. This could discourage badly needed foreign healthcare workers from volunteering, as with no military airlift planned, they need commercial flights to get home.
This would be catastrophic, preventing any further organised effort to fight the infection. Moreover, a collapse in food distribution or public safety could send a flood of refugees across land borders, for eg carrying Ebola to nearby, impoverished countries.
Related Questions
Navigate
Integrity-first tutoring: explanations and feedback only — we do not complete graded work. Learn more.