So, I\'m working in the backyard this weekend and the dogs are all up in my busi

Question

So, I'm working in the backyard this weekend and the dogs are all up in my business, trying to get me to play with them. And as I was wrestling around with the pitbull I noticed something that we're all aware of in one form or another namely that animals are incredibly strong, especially given the package that they comeI inflicted by a 50-pound Lucy (that's my dog) compared to a 50-pound toddler named Tucker (not my kid, not a big fan of the name) So is there even a difference, and if so, why is that? This has everything to do with the course and simultaneously nothing at all. An opportunity to think a little, reflect on what we've covered, and use clear and concise logic to make a reasonable argument.

Explanation / Answer

When it comes to humans and animals, animals are stronger than humans. The defence organs and strength of animals are far more superior to human. The toddler and the pitbull weighing 50 pound each therefore, would not be equal in strength, ferocity and therefore inflicted damage measures. The jaw strength of pitbull and the anatomical postioning and size of teeth are meant to cut through the meat effortlessly. Thus, the damage inflicted by the 50 pound pitbull is greater. The stronger nails meant for digging the soil also can inflict damage. The physical attributes of dog are different than the same weighing toddler. The toddler lacks strength, the milk teeth (even teeth of adult human) are not meant for meat and rough skin cutting.

Also, the mannerism such as self-protection, aggression and the ferocity in the dog can inflict damage.

Though the weight of toddler and the dog is same, the dog would inflict much more damage than the toddler.

Related Questions

Navigate

• Browse (All)
• Browse S
• Subjects

---

---

Integrity-first tutoring: explanations and feedback only — we do not complete graded work. Learn more.