Four years ago, Victor Consuelo purchased a very reliable automobile (as rated b
ID: 3378378 • Letter: F
Question
Four years ago, Victor Consuelo purchased a very reliable automobile (as rated by a reputable consumer advocacy publication). His warranty has just expired, but the manufacturer has just offered him a 5-year, bumper-to-bumper warranty extension. The warranty costs $3,400. Consuelo constructs the following probability distribution with respect to anticipated costs if he chooses not to purchase the extended warranty.
Cost (in $) Probability 900 0.19 2,800 0.48 4,700 0.20 11,000 0.13 Calculate Victor’s expected cost. Expected cost $ b. Given your answer in part (a), should Victor purchase the extended warranty? (Assume risk neutrality.) No YesFour years ago, Victor Consuelo purchased a very reliable automobile (as rated by a reputable consumer advocacy publication). His warranty has just expired, but the manufacturer has just offered him a 5-year, bumper-to-bumper warranty extension. The warranty costs $3,400. Consuelo constructs the following probability distribution with respect to anticipated costs if he chooses not to purchase the extended warranty.
Explanation / Answer
Consider the table:
Thus, his expected cost is $3885. [ANSWER]
*********************************
b) As this is greater than the cost of waranty, then YES, HE SHOULD PURCHASE THE WARRANTY.
x P(x) x P(x) 900 0.19 171 2800 0.48 1344 4700 0.2 940 11000 0.13 1430Related Questions
drjack9650@gmail.com
Navigate
Integrity-first tutoring: explanations and feedback only — we do not complete graded work. Learn more.