Academic Integrity: tutoring, explanations, and feedback — we don’t complete graded work or submit on a student’s behalf.

Two companies McDonald\'s and Coach. collect data from online Select two compani

ID: 2755155 • Letter: T

Question

Two companies McDonald's and Coach. collect data from online

Select two companies in two different industries and do the following: Provide background information on the company and describe the industry in which the company operates in and its main products. Determine key macro economic factors in compacting each firm. List and describe the major competitors to the selected company. Evaluate each firm using potter's determinants of competition. Compute and interpret the financial ratios described for a five year period. Look at the trend in the ratios to determine if they are deteriorating or improving and compare them against peers or the industry: Current and quick ratios and net working capital Inventory turnover, fixed assets turnover and total assets turnover debt ratio and TIE. Gross profit margin and net profit margin and operating margin Roe and Roa Find beta, R squared, alpha and the residual standard deviation for each firm using Excel. Interpret the results and recommend which firm should be added to a well diversified portfolio. Use 60 months of return data for the calculations. Find the correlation between the two stocks and interpret. Estimate the required for each stock (SML) Estimate the sustainable growth rate (g) for each stock. Find it for 3 years and take an average. Evaluate the 5 and 10- years historic growth rate in earnings. Compare to sustainable growth method. Estimate the intrinsic value (price) of the two stocks using the 1) dividend discount model (DDM) approach and the 2) P/E multiplier approach. Make a buy or sell recommendation. Evaluate stock using value criteria of dividend yield and price to book. Use the Black-scholes model to find the value of a call option and the value of a put opion for each stock

Explanation / Answer

a) McDonald's operates and franchises McDonald's restaurants which serve locally relevant food and drinks sold at various affordable price points in more than 100 countries. McDonald’s operating in the restaurant industry offers a substantially uniform menu although there is geographic adjustment to suit local customers taste. Menu includes hamburgers, cheese burgers, Big McChicken sandwiches, French fries, shakes and beverages.

Coach Inc. is a leading design house of New York with modern luxury accessories and lifestyle collections. Coach is one of the fine accessories brands in the US and international markets. Coach’s operating in premium accessories industry with product offerings include broad range of high quality leather, fabrics and materials as women's and men's bags, business cases,footwear,watches,weekend travel accessories,jewellery.COach offer multiple styles and product categories increasing accessories wardrobe.

b) McDonald’s results are affected by economic conditions which can impact customer’s disposable income and spending habits. The economic conditions can be affected by got economic interventions, inflation, wage control measures, interest rate, unemployment and taxation. Adverse changes in these factors can negatively affect eh results, for e.g. high unemployment can decrease spending levels which could affect the customers visiting restaurant and thus lower sales.

Coach Inc. results can be affected by a number of macro factors as spending levels, consumer confidence,unemployment,interest rates, raw materials cost and inflation. Consumer purchases of discretionary items such as Coach products tends to decline during periods of high unemployment, high interest rates and inflations levels when disposable income becomes lower.

c) Competitors McDonald’s: Doctor’s Associates Inc, Yum! Brands Inc.

Competitors Coach Inc: Dooney and Bourke Inc, MICHAEL KORS (USA) Inc, Kate Spade LLC

Porter’s analysis:

McDonald's

Coach Inc.

Threat of new Entrant

Easy access market and low start-up cost.e.g. Subways market penetration, Its high.

To start up a new brand significant capital expenditure is needed, a new player would find difficulty in achieving the brand and loyalty as of Coach, however new internet accessories business can make entry easily. Threat is moderate to low.

Degree of rivalry among competitors

Very competitive fast food indutry, competitve advertising capabilities, competition from established local food outlets and industry players. It’s high.

Intense competition from upcoming fashion companies, competitve accessories and handbags market, incresing private labellings.Its high.

Bargaining power of buyers

Customers should be kept satisfied with prices and food offerings as switching cost is low to other local fast food. It’s high.

Buyers can easily switch to other brands as Michael Cors, direct channel sales primarily (large no of buyers) and very low 10% is sold through wholesale channel therefore its moderate.

Threat of Substitutes

Fast food as pizza, coffee and other food items from subways and local food cuisines. It’s high.

Counterfeit products can pose a threat especially in emerging markets as china can dilute the value of the company hence it’s a serious threat to look into.

Bargaining power of suppliers

It’s low. Due to scale of the firm operations suppliers are happy and their Bargaining power is low.

Manufacturing of goods is done be large number of suppliers with no major supplier from across various geographies hence suppliers bargaining power is limited. Apart from few 1 or 2 exceptional suppliers which have bargaining power. It’s moderate.

d)

2010-12

4,369

2,925

110

2011-12

4,403

3,509

117

2012-12

4,922

3,403

122

2013-12

5,050

3,170

124

2014-12

4,186

2,748

110

2010-12

14,437

22,061

31,975

24,075

2011-12

16,319

22,835

32,990

27,006

2012-12

16,751

24,677

35,387

27,567

2013-12

17,203

25,747

36,626

28,106

2014-12

16,986

24,558

34,281

27,441

2010-12

17,341

451

7,473

2011-12

18,600

493

8,530

2012-12

20,093

517

8,605

2013-12

20,617

522

8,764

2014-12

21,428

571

7,949

2010-12

4,946

2011-12

5,503

2012-12

5,465

2013-12

5,586

2014-12

4,758

2010-12

14,634

2011-12

14,390

2012-12

15,294

2013-12

16,010

2014-12

12,853

2010-12

2011-12

2012-12

2013-12

2014-12

Current ratio and  Quick ratio has been hovering around 1.5 with a dip in the recent year.These have almost remain the same over past 5 years.The turnovers Asset T/o and Inventory Turnover have shown improvements that means the firm is utilising its Asset more efficientely with improved inventory management.

Debt ratio for McDonald has been increasing over past 5 years with the ratio much lower than the industry average.The TIE has decreases over the past year but it remains healthy at almost 13-16 times.

The Net profit margin for the industry is 7.5% as compared to higher margins of the Mcdonald.However the margins have been dipping since last few years.

THe ROE for the McDonald has been around 35 % much higher than industry average of 24.8%.THe ROA for the McDonald has dipped a bit.

PE for McDonald has increased from 16 to 19 much lower than industry average while PB has been around 6 point something while industry average is negative.

2011-06

1,452

593

422

2012-06

1,805

718

504

2013-06

2,071

723

525

2014-06

1,855

813

526

2015-06

2,507

835

485

2011-06

1,135

582

2,635

4,159

2012-06

1,297

644

3,104

4,763

2013-06

1,377

695

3,532

5,075

2014-06

1,509

714

3,663

4,806

2015-06

1,283

733

4,667

4,192

2011-06

1,023

0

1,305

2012-06

1,111

0

1,512

2013-06

1,123

0

1,525

2014-06

1,242

0

1,120

2015-06

2,177

0

618

2011-06

881

2012-06

1,039

2013-06

1,034

2014-06

781

2015-06

402

2011-06

1,613

2012-06

1,993

2013-06

2,409

2014-06

2,421

2015-06

2,490

2011-06

2012-06

2013-06

2014-06

2015-06

Current ratio and  Quick ratio has been icreasing in the recent years.The turnovers Asset T/o and Inventory Turnover have not shown improvements that means the firm is not utilising its Asset more efficientely with not so great inventory management.

Debt ratio for Coach has been decreasing over past years until it increased suddenly to all time high of .4664 with the ratio much lower than the industry average of .98.The interest expense is almost nil.

The Net profit margin for the industry is 9.6% as compared to higher margins of the Coach .However the margins have been dipping since last few years.

THe ROE for the Coach has been decreasing 54% to 16% in last 5 years but still much higher than industry average of 21.2%.THe ROA for the Coach has dipped from 33% to almost 9%.

PE for Coach has remained arounf 20 lower than industry average while PB has dipped from 11 to 3 while industry average is higher at 7.2.

McDonald's

Coach Inc.

Threat of new Entrant

Easy access market and low start-up cost.e.g. Subways market penetration, Its high.

To start up a new brand significant capital expenditure is needed, a new player would find difficulty in achieving the brand and loyalty as of Coach, however new internet accessories business can make entry easily. Threat is moderate to low.

Degree of rivalry among competitors

Very competitive fast food indutry, competitve advertising capabilities, competition from established local food outlets and industry players. It’s high.

Intense competition from upcoming fashion companies, competitve accessories and handbags market, incresing private labellings.Its high.

Bargaining power of buyers

Customers should be kept satisfied with prices and food offerings as switching cost is low to other local fast food. It’s high.

Buyers can easily switch to other brands as Michael Cors, direct channel sales primarily (large no of buyers) and very low 10% is sold through wholesale channel therefore its moderate.

Threat of Substitutes

Fast food as pizza, coffee and other food items from subways and local food cuisines. It’s high.

Counterfeit products can pose a threat especially in emerging markets as china can dilute the value of the company hence it’s a serious threat to look into.

Bargaining power of suppliers

It’s low. Due to scale of the firm operations suppliers are happy and their Bargaining power is low.

Manufacturing of goods is done be large number of suppliers with no major supplier from across various geographies hence suppliers bargaining power is limited. Apart from few 1 or 2 exceptional suppliers which have bargaining power. It’s moderate.

Hire Me For All Your Tutoring Needs
Integrity-first tutoring: clear explanations, guidance, and feedback.
Drop an Email at
drjack9650@gmail.com
Chat Now And Get Quote