I have ask this question before and keep getting the same answer and its wrong,

Question

I have ask this question before and keep getting the same answer and its wrong, please help me with this.

Capital budgeting criteria: ethical considerations
A mining company is considering a new project. Because the mine has received a permit, the project would be legal; but it would cause significant harm to a nearby river. The firm could spend an additional $9.33 million at Year 0 to mitigate the environmental problem, but it would not be required to do so. Developing the mine (without mitigation) would cost $54 million, and the expected net cash inflows would be $18 million per year for 5 years. If the firm does invest in mitigation, the annual inflows would be $19 million. The risk adjusted WACC is 14%.

1. Calculate the NPV and IRR with mitigation. Round your answers to two decimal places.

NPV $ _______millions This answer is NOT $1,152,692.79
IRR $________ % This answer is NOT 19%


Calculate the NPV and IRR without mitigation. Round your answers to two decimal places.

NPV $ _______millions This answer is NOT $187.757.20
IRR $________ % This answer is NOT 20%

Please help with the figures

Explanation / Answer

Calculate the NPV and IRR with mitigation. Round your answers to two decimal places. NPV $ 1.89millions IRR 15.24 % Calculate the NPV and IRR without mitigation. Round your answers to two decimal places. NPV $7.79millions IRR 19.86%

Related Questions

Navigate

• Browse (All)
• Browse I
• Subjects

---

---

Integrity-first tutoring: explanations and feedback only — we do not complete graded work. Learn more.