Read the Ace Heating and Cooling scenario in your text and answer the following

Question

Read the Ace Heating and Cooling scenario in your text and answer the following questions:

Under UCC 2-302, who has the best chance of getting out of the contract due to unconsionability?

The symbol for justice features a woman wearing a blindfold illustrating that the law should be applied the same way regardless of who the parties are. Does the UCC rule seem to contradict this? Which approach do you think is more ethical?

Note that both Glamour and Shady Rest are businesses, and courts rarely find that contracts between two businesses are unconscionable. The rationale is that a business is a sophisticated entity, familiar with transactions and able to protect itself. Do you think Glamour and Shady Rest are in a comparable position in regard to this contract? Why or why not?

Please provide a new answer in not one that has already been answered.

Explanation / Answer

The best chane of getting out of the contract is with the single mother because of unconscionability,considering the rule UCC-2-302 , rule considers the fair bargaining power of the parties during the time of entering into the written contract,this is contradicting the symbolic representation of law with the blind folded women.It is believed that rule U22-2-302 is more ethical approach since it focuses on unfair results against one part by the other.Regarding the comparable position of Glamour and shady rest , Glamour has a better financial position,However both the parties entered into the contracts at inflated prices to satisfy their immediate requirements.Thus it can be concluded that shady rest has entered into contract out of conveniance of timing over pricing since their isnt any indication of ethics of availabilty of the other AC units

Related Questions

Navigate

• Browse (All)
• Browse R
• Subjects

Integrity-first tutoring: explanations and feedback only — we do not complete graded work. Learn more.