Scenario : a 40 y/o female was Diagnosed with CA of the Liver about 1 week ago.

Question

Scenario: a 40 y/o female was Diagnosed with CA of the Liver about 1 week ago. Preliminary findings suggest that the CA has not spread. She is hospitalized today because of severe abdominal pain which is not relieved by any type of OTC analgesics. Current treatment consists of possible surgery if CA is localized, chemo and radiation. She is still undergoing evaluation of what is the best approach for her.. Her team of physicians cannot agree on the plan of action regarding pain control. Some say Oral Tylenol # 3 another says Demerol while another believes in a more natural integrated approach…. such as bio feedback, pain meds, Nutritional changes, Mind Body Spirit Approach, spiritual counselling. The patient is angry with the Dx. She cries and becomes very angry intermittently. She is demanding that her pain be addressed and is very dissatisfied with her CA team members.

Question: At this point, no one knows if the CA is terminal. What are your thoughts regarding how to address her pain? Do you confront the doctors, work with the patient, the social worker, the chaplain? Should the pt be given heavy duty analgesia so soon into her CA Dx? What about addiction, or resistance to stronger meds down the line?

Explanation / Answer

One of doctors’ most problematic responsibilities is to provide patients bad news about their well-being or diagnosis. Even with important improvements in therapeutic teaching on announcement in end-of-life deliberations, many medics do not continuously feel adequately equipped for this intimidating chore. The nervousness of the condition may cause doctors to circumvent having expressive deliberations or collaborating sufficiently with patients identified with a fatal illness and with their relations. Deteriorating to connect efficiently can occasionally principal to unwelcome penalties such as invasive events, rather than concentrating on ease and provision for the patient. This, in turn, may hurried then avoidable grievances and lawful actions in contradiction of doctors.

Afterward consuming time to engross the news from the initial conversation, patients and relations may appeal follow-up deliberations. During these following deliberations, patients should be assumed the chance to ask extra queries, and doctors should be prepared to recurrence the info or deliver more particulars. At such follow-up conferences, the goalmouths of care, action selections, and end-of-life partialities should be debated. The goalmouths of care must be regularly evaluated over time and persist attentive on sympathy and the requirements of the patient. The patient’s demonstrative state must be carefully checked. In adding to interactive with the patient and domestic, when suitable, the most-responsible doctor should also connect pertinent info to the care crew.

These deliberations and movements should be recognized in the medical greatest. Upholding hope is critical for countless patients. When a therapy is not a likely consequence, hope may be attentive on attaining ease and superiority of life. Patients will want to know around their selections for soothing care, and relations may want to seek obtainable community-based provision. This may also be a decent time to talk with the patient around whether they want mystical provision and to straight them to capitals, as suitable. The patient wants to know that the surgeon cares and will deliver the essential provision or find capitals to do so.

Related Questions

Navigate

• Browse (All)
• Browse S
• Subjects

Integrity-first tutoring: explanations and feedback only — we do not complete graded work. Learn more.