Dr. Gregory B. Nazar removed a malignant tumor rom Roe Branham\'s brain on Febru

Question

Dr. Gregory B. Nazar removed a malignant tumor rom Roe Branham's brain on February 27, 2000. The surgery was a success, but shortly afterward Branham began to experience pain in his head. The pain was dismissed as being a side effect of the surgery. The pain continued several weeks, and a medical assessment uncovered a Durahook ( a small, metallic object used to hold sot tissues apart) that was left in Branham's scalp during the surgery. On August 10, 2000 the hook was surgically removed without complications. The second procedure cost Branham $11,900. What would Branham have to prove to win a cse based on medical malpractice? Who ultimately won the case? Nazar v. Branham, 291 S.W. 3d 599

Explanation / Answer

Definitely Branham would win the case because due to care lessness of the surgeon he survive in pain. He could not live quality live from feb 27 ,2000 to Aug 10, 2000. Besides he has to undergone another surgery that could be life taking.

Further this surgery cost him which was not in his budget .This extra burden could have created tension which could be life threatening.

Branham have to prove that the act of Surgeon was totally an act of negligence, which cost him montary and physically.This also tense him

Related Questions

Navigate

• Browse (All)
• Browse D
• Subjects

Integrity-first tutoring: explanations and feedback only — we do not complete graded work. Learn more.