This discussion board is open for any questions or comments in a new thread, but

Question

This discussion board is open for any questions or comments in a new thread, but please address the followng: 1. If the controlling majority of a corporation's stockholders vote to re-invest profits in a way that benefits employees or society, rather than disbursing that money to the shareholders, should that action be allowed? If the majority stockholders are not benefiting in an unfair manner by this decision, why should the minority have the ability to overturn the majority vote? 2. Should corporate income be double-taxed? Why or why not? 3.Should corporations enjoy the same freedom of speech rights that natural persons enjoy? Why or why not?

Explanation / Answer

Answer 1:

Yes, the action should be followed as majority of the corporation's shareholder votw to re-invest profits so that employees of the society are benefited, this will increase employees morale and satisfaction and increase productivity and efficiency of the employees which will help in increasing overall profits of the firm.

Since, the decision is not benefiting everyone in an unfair manner by this decision, the minority should have the ability to overturn the majority vote. This is because continuing a scheme which is unfair will lead to decline in firm's productivity and such a scheme should be ended and minority should have the ability to overturn the majority vote.

Related Questions

Navigate

• Browse (All)
• Browse T
• Subjects

Integrity-first tutoring: explanations and feedback only — we do not complete graded work. Learn more.