Imagine you are a scientist sequencing the genomes of organisms.You begin two ne

Question

Imagine you are a scientist sequencing the genomes of organisms.You begin two new projects, one sequencing the genome of an amoeba and the second sequencing the genome of a cow.You discover that the genome size (sometimes called C-value) of the amoeba is nearly 200X as large as that of the cow.

a) Should this come as a surprise?Why or why not?

b) What characteristic of eukaryotic organisms explains the variation in genome sizes?

c) What would your expectation be if you were to sequence the genome of a bacterium? Explain

Explanation / Answer

C-worth is the sum, in picograms, of DNA contained inside of a haploid core (e.g. a gamete) or one a large portion of the sum in a diploid somatic cell of an eukaryotic organism. Sometimes (, the terms C-worth and genome size are utilized reciprocally; be that as it may, in polyploids the C-value may speak to two or more genomescontained inside of the same nucleus.

The term C-value mirrors this watched steadiness. On the other hand, it was soon found that C-values (genome sizes) change massively among species and this bears no relationship to the assumed number of genes .Given that C-value were thought to be consistent on the grounds that genetic data is encoded by DNA, but then bore no relationship to assumed gene number, this was justifiably viewed as confusing; the expression "C-value paradox" was utilized to depict this circumstance The revelation of non-coding DNA in the mid 1970s determined the primary question of the C-value paradox : genome size does not reflect gene number in eukaryotes since the majority of their DNA is non-coding and along these lines does not comprise of gene. The human genome, for instance, contains under 2% protein-coding districts, with the rest of different sorts of non-coding DNA. Hence this question did not surprise.

b)

In eukaryotes (yet not prokaryotes), variety in genome size is not relative to the quantity of genes, a perception that was considered completely illogical before the disclosure of non-coding DNA and which got to be referred to as the C-value paradox thus.

Then again, in spite of the fact that there is no more any paradoxical perspective to the error between genome size and gene number, this term stays in like manner use. For reasons of applied elucidation, the different riddles that stay concerning genome size variety rather have been proposed by one creator to all the more precisely involve a riddle or a puzzler (the C-value enigma ). Genome size connects with a scope of elements at the cell and living being levels, including cell size, cell division rate, and, contingent upon the taxon, body size, metabolic rate,developmental rate, organ complexity , geographical distribution, or extinction risk.

In view of totally sequenced genome information as of now accessible, log-changed gene number structures a direct connection with log-changed genome size in microbes, archea, infections, and organelles joined while a nonlinear correlation in eukaryotes

The nonlinear relationship for eukaryotes, in spite of the fact that claim of its presence differentiates the past perspective that no connection exists for this gathering of life forms, reflects excessively quick expanding noncoding DNA in progressively substantial eukaryotic genomes. Despite the fact that sequenced genome information are for all intents and purposes one-sided toward little genomes, which may compromise the exactness of the experimentally determined connection, and a definitive evidence of the relationship stays to be gotten by sequencing a percentage of the biggest eukaryotic genomes, current information don't appear to preclude a correlation.

Sequence comparisons show that the most bacterial proteins are highly conserved in evolution, allowing predictions to be made about the functions of most products of an uncharacterized genome. Bacterial genomes differ vastly in their gene repertoires. Although genes for components of the translation and transcription machinery, and for molecular chaperones, are typically maintained, many regulatory and metabolic systems are absent in bacteria with small genomes. Mycoplasma genitalium, with the smallest known genome of any cellular life form, lacks virtually all known regulatory genes, and its gene expression may be regulated differently than in other bacteria. Genome organization is evolutionarily labile: extensive gene shuffling leaves only very few conserved gene arrays in distantly related bacteria.

c)

Succession examinations demonstrate that the most bacterial proteins are exceedingly conserved in evolution, permitting expectations to be made about the elements of most results of an uncharacterized genome. Bacterial genomes contrast endlessly in their gene collections. In spite of the fact that genes for parts of the translation and transcription machinery, and for molecular chaperones, are normally kept up, numerous regulatory and metabolic system are missing in microscopic organisms with little genomes. Mycoplasma genitalium, with the littlest known genome of any cell living thing, needs practically all known regulatory genes, and its gene expression may be directed uniquely in contrast to in other microbes. Genome association is developmentally labile: broad gene rearranging leaves just not very many monitored gene exhibits in indirectly related bacteria.

Related Questions

Navigate

• Browse (All)
• Browse I
• Subjects

Integrity-first tutoring: explanations and feedback only — we do not complete graded work. Learn more.