look around your organization and at cases reported in the news. how often do we
ID: 465672 • Letter: L
Question
look around your organization and at cases reported in the news. how often do we draw conclusion that plans are working based on feel good evaluations or anecdotal reports rather than solid scientific evaluation? what are the consequences at work and in society when plans are implemented at great cost, but without defensible system of evaluation? even if the objectives of a project are honorable, what ethical issues aries in situations where it isnt clear that the project is having the intended benefit?
Explanation / Answer
We often draw conclusions based out of our personal feel good evaluations first and then conclude based on the scientific evaluation. It is a general human tendency to look into something that way. A feeling is something inner, very personal and close to the heart and that acts first in any case, and then comes the scientific evaluation into being. Say for example, if a team has completed a critical project, which took them months to finish. Primarily, they knew that they have done it brilliantly well, but that is only due to some feel food evaluation of the team. But with the scientific evaluation of the project from the vendor or the customer on its performance and rating, if the customer gives the best rating on the way the project is working, then that's the real success of the team. But again, that is secondary. This way, we often draw conclusions that the plans are working based on our feel good evaluations first and then conclude with the scientific evaluations later.
If the plans are implemented at a greater cost, then it should definitely have a backup plan. You never know what goes wrong in between and a back up plan or a contingency plan is always mandatory. The contingency plan acts as a defensible system which evaluates whether the plans are being headed towards the right direction, with right attributes in place. But if there is no defensible system of the evaluation, then its consequences are that the original intentions of the planner may be proved inadequate or wrong by the society or at work. A contingency plan is a must for any plan though it is implemented with great cost or less cost.
Even if the objectives of the project are honorable, ethical issues arise for every situation. And the issues are greater in the situations where there are no clear objectives on the intended benefit of the project. So, the objectives and the goals of every project has to be clearly defined. With a clear planning and implementation of the project, the ethical issues might prove the intentions wrong. So, if there are any intended benefits for any plans or projects, that should be addressed first in order to break any obligations.
Related Questions
Navigate
Integrity-first tutoring: explanations and feedback only — we do not complete graded work. Learn more.