Read this NY Times summary of the legal case of Mrs. Vega. http://www.nytimes.co
ID: 459137 • Letter: R
Question
Read this NY Times summary of the legal case of Mrs. Vega. http://www.nytimes.com/1996/04/09/nyregion/patient-wins-a-court-ruling-barring-forced-transfusions.html Then discuss these questions: 1. Do you agree with the decision of the N.Y. Supreme Court that the hospital did not have the right to render life-saving aid in the form of a blood transfusion in this case? 2. Should hospitals be allowed to overrule patient’s decisions when those decisions put the patient’s life at risk of immediate harm? Why or why not?
Explanation / Answer
You must to know that this is an personal opinion about that case, so i hope you will be about my perspective. We have to be clear that the N.Y. Supreme court is not in the NY times post, is the Stamford Superior Court, The hospital is a branch of the NewYork-Presbyterian Healthcare System maybe theres is the confussion.
1.- I'm not agree with the desicion, because if you go to a hospital is looking for better conditions to preserve your health, either preventive or corrective way, as it has been in this case, since the transfusion was done to avoid a severe bleed in, and the death of Ms. Vega. As a user of a hospital, I must be aware that doctors endeavor to save my life, and my baby. If so important to the community of Jehovah's Witnesses situations like this, why not open exclusive hospitals for them? Applying traditional medicine respecting their religious and ethical beliefs, this way I really see the problem. Quoting Albert Einstein Said That ethics are an exclusive human concern, without any superhuman authority behind it. I think the behavior of Vega, may be considered offensive to the ethics of the doctors of the hospital, so, depends from the point of view you want to see this case. That's mine regarding your first question.
2.- If you go to a hospital seeking health, as I have previously said preventive or corrective way, you will find health. Doctors are qualified to recommend the best for your health. But hospitals can be created for special religions, or religions could get specialists how this, that put their beliefs about their professional ethics as doctors responsible for what might happen or not the patient. It is very likely that failure to act properly with the patient Vega, the scandal would have been to take into account the opinion of someone who for religious reasons endangers not just her own integrity, but concerns rather her newborn baby.
Related Questions
Navigate
Integrity-first tutoring: explanations and feedback only — we do not complete graded work. Learn more.