3. Assuming the existence of a complete and final written contract, the parol ev

ID: 449858 • Letter: 3

Question

3. Assuming the existence of a complete and final written contract, the parol evidence rule would prohibit evidence of

A. subsequent oral statements that modify the contract

B. prior or contemporaneous oral statements that explain ambiguities in the contract

C. prior or contemporaneous oral statements that alter, contradict, or add to the terms of the contract

D. A and C

4. The CISG:

A. provides uniformity for transactions among contracting parties in different states in the United States.

B. applies only to services, not sales of goods

C. applies only to consumers, not commercial parties

D. only applies to companies whose countries have signed the convention.

3. Assuming the existence of a complete and final written contract, the parol evidence rule would prohibit evidence of

ans c - . Assuming the existence of a complete and final written contract, the parol evidence rule would prohibit evidence of

4. The CISG:

ans - A. provides uniformity for transactions among contracting parties in different states in the United States.

Integrity-first tutoring: explanations and feedback only — we do not complete graded work. Learn more.