18. Adam, a famous columnist, published his personal opinion about politicians s

Question

18. Adam, a famous columnist, published his personal opinion about politicians stating, "Politicians are only interested in getting re-elected, not in good government." Can politicians sue him for defamation?

A. As a well-known columnist, Adam should only report known facts.

B. No, because as a general rule the material in a newspaper is totally exempted.

C. Yes, because defamation in a newspaper is always a tort.

D. No, because statements of pure opinion do not qualify as defamation.

E. Yes, because Adam wrote even though he did not have authority.

19. Reggie ordered a drink at a restaurant. The drink contained a dead bug. Fortunately, He noticed this before He drank it. He sued the restaurant for negligence. The most likely result will be:

A. Reggie will win because the restaurant failed to use due care

B. Reggie will not win since he did not sustain any damages

C. Reggie will win if he can prove emotional distress

D. Reggie will not win as foreign objects in foods are foreseeable

Explanation / Answer

18. No, because statements of pure opinion do not qualify as defamation. He has presented any factual data. So it is not a case for improper representation of facts. It is just his opinion and his opinion is not against a particular person and has would not had damaged any politicians chance of re-election.

19.Reggie will not win since he did not sustain any damages.If you suffer food poisoning or otherwise fall ill because of the insect in your food, then you may be able to sue the restaurant. Emotional distress is difficult to prove and you need to show that you took doctor;s consulation for that trauma which is very difficult and hence doesnot qualify for tort.

Related Questions

Navigate

• Browse (All)
• Browse 1
• Subjects

Integrity-first tutoring: explanations and feedback only — we do not complete graded work. Learn more.