please give me some idea or suggustion to write a philo. business ethics eassy.
ID: 432065 • Letter: P
Question
please give me some idea or suggustion to write a philo. business ethics eassy.
Formulate your answer, to the question presented in the topic you chose, in the form of a thesis. Advance your thesis in the introductory paragraph, explaining by what means you are going to demonstrate your case. In the following paragraphs, lay out the reasons to support of your answer. After displaying your argument, bring up an objection to one or more of the reasons you presented. That objection should also come in a form of a well-reasoned argument. That is to say, tell the reader (me) what is the main point of the objection and then present reasons for anyone to consider that objection seriously. Finally, rebuttal: reply to the objection, explaining why the reader should accept your reasoning despite the objection. Maximum number of words: 1500.
Topic :
Brad is a production engineer at a bicycle company. Part of his job includes inspecting broken bikes and drafting the design plans for their repair.
One day, Brad receives instructions from his supervisor to repair a bike whose brake cables had snapped. When Brad inspects the bike, he notices the cables had snapped because they were made from a low-quality material. He suspects that this bike had been custom designed, and that the customer simply did not know what materials would be best suited for the brake cables. Therefore, when Brad drafts his design plans for the repair of the bike, he incorporates a more durable material for the cables.
When Brad goes to repair the bike, he finds out the customer had specifically requested that the bike be repaired, but no aesthetic changes should be made to the bike. Brad’s design for the bike will change the look of the bike, but it will also make the bike more durable. When Brad goes to his manager and asks him what to do, his manager tells him that “the customer is always right” and he should repair the bike as the customer requested.
Brad knows he could repair the bike according to the customer’s wishes, but if he does, the bike will break down again in a few months, perhaps dangerously. However, if he implements his design improvements, he risks going against his manager and the wishes of the customer.
What should Brad prioritize: the customer’s safety or the customer’s desires? Evaluate this case from your own perspective, using the theories of corporate responsibility, either in support of your argument or in objection to it.
Explanation / Answer
Answer: In this essay you should argue that Brad should implement his own design improvements and try to convince his manager and customer about the danger which is associated with the repairing the bike as per the customer’s instruction. Brad should convince his manager to talk to the customer about the negative outcomes which may take place later if the bike is not repaired as per Brads’ own design. The ethical theory of consequential-ism which says that it is the ultimate consequences of an action that makes it right or wrong should be used to justify this stand. If the bike is repaired as per customer’s instruction then it can later break again in more deadly manner which may even cost the customer his life and will harm the reputation of the company. Therefore it will be against ethics to do so without informing the customers about the negative consequences of repairing the bike as per his instructions.
This argument can then be given an objection that it is the ethical duty of an employee to follow the instructions provided to him by the organization and customer. The deontological ethical theory will be used for supporting this objection as it says that morality and ethics lies in performing one’s duty without looking into its consequences. Hence Brad should follow what his managers say.
Then a counter argument against the objection can be given that the duty of an employee is not just limited to follow orders but to it also involves protection of his organization and client’s interests. As this act can result in a situation where the reputation of the organization and life and property of the client is in danger hence it is duty of Brad to make his manager and client aware about the situation and perform the repair work as per his own design. Therefore the objection does not hold but the first argument holds.
This is the basic idea which can be elaborated in the actual essay.
Related Questions
Navigate
Integrity-first tutoring: explanations and feedback only — we do not complete graded work. Learn more.