a. Which of the following is an advantage of collaborating? It causes firms to c
ID: 425625 • Letter: A
Question
a.
Which of the following is an advantage of collaborating?
It causes firms to commit to assets that will rapidly become obsolete.
It increases a product's cycle time.
It increases the in-house development time for projects.
It gives firms more flexibility.
b.
Which of the following is an advantage of collaborating at the development stage of a technology?
It increases asset commitment to obsolete products.
It increases a product's cycle time.
It ensures cooperation in the commercialization stage.
It facilitates the emergence of multiple competing standards for a product.
It causes firms to commit to assets that will rapidly become obsolete.
It increases a product's cycle time.
It increases the in-house development time for projects.
It gives firms more flexibility.
b.
Which of the following is an advantage of collaborating at the development stage of a technology?
It increases asset commitment to obsolete products.
It increases a product's cycle time.
It ensures cooperation in the commercialization stage.
It facilitates the emergence of multiple competing standards for a product.
Explanation / Answer
Collaborative efforts in the workplace can result in revolutionary systems to tasks, new tactics to achieve key tasks and shared strategies on diversified obligations. Nonetheless, like some other workplace procedure, there are advantages and drawbacks to collaboration within the office. Working out these pros and cons goes a long way towards addressing any clash that can crop up therefore.
Better Division of Labor
one of the advantages of collaborative efforts in the office is the best way that the work is split. When more than one individual is concerned in accomplishing a designated task, principally when it is a big mission, it helps for each person to have a small portion of the responsibility to make certain matters get achieved versus loading one or two folks with too much work to achieve the undertaking.
Larger creative input
when you've got distinctive humans taking part on a challenge, you then get a greater feel of ingenious input. You are equipped to tap into the creative combo of a couple of employees in a single staff. The collection of unique suggestions, systems to the assignment and brainstorms can spur revolutionary outcome that may in turn carry the visibility and great of the merchandise or services offered by means of your manufacturer.
Increased employee Morale
Having staff collaborate also has a constructive influence on their morale. As employees work collectively to achieve goals, they are able to have fun their successes each in my view and as a group, and this may rationale them to have a more confident view of their jobs and workforce contributors. In flip, this can additionally build trust amongst co-staff as each and every member contributes to the team's accomplishments.
Too Many faux Leaders
if you have a collaborative group, you may normally become with too many people seeking to lead the team, and now not ample contributors which might be willing to take a backseat and simply do what it takes to get the job executed. This ill will can then bleed over into different areas of the work atmosphere, inflicting more anxiety among the many rest of the staff, together with people who would possibly not even be concerned within the collaborative effort.
Conflicts in Working styles
when you team distinctive people together to collaborate on one challenge or set of duties, there could also be a clash in the working styles of the individuals inside the staff. This is a disadvantage in view that it will probably keep up development on conducting the job at hand, at the same time staff individuals instead clutter via conflicts triggered by means of the distinctive methods team individuals process the work.
Related Questions
Navigate
Integrity-first tutoring: explanations and feedback only — we do not complete graded work. Learn more.