T/F ___9. In Washington, damages for wrongful termination in violation of public
ID: 425492 • Letter: T
Question
T/F
___9. In Washington, damages for wrongful termination in violation of public policy do not include damages for emotional distress.
___10. In awarding a remedy for a breach of contract involving the sale of goods, a court will typically award the non-breaching party the difference between the contract price and the market price of the goods, as compensatory damages (plus any incidental expenses).
___11. In a contract involving the sale of land, an award of money damages is always the most appropriate remedy to seek when the seller has breached the agreement.
___12. Requirements contracts (for the sale of goods) are not ever enforceable, because they are illusory contracts. Hint: check UCC notes
Explanation / Answer
Answer:
9. False
Explanation:
This pertains to a case named: Cagle vs Burns & Roe, INC. In this case the court ruled that when the employee is terminated in violation of public policy, then the employee is entitled to receive damages for emotional distress as well.
10. True
Explanation:
In a breach of contract regarding sales of good the compensation is generally equal to the difference between the contract price and the market price. Although in some rare cases like if purchasing party has breached and the selling party is yet to produce the goods then compensations are equal to the lost profits on the sale of those goods by the selling party to buying party.
Note: Chegg mandates answering first question, although it encourages to answer as much as possible, so as a chegg expert I have answered the second on as well for the better understanding of student. Kindly repost the unanswered questions to get them answered.
Related Questions
Navigate
Integrity-first tutoring: explanations and feedback only — we do not complete graded work. Learn more.