Based on the 3 basic rights of workers, and the new voluntary psychological stan

Question

Based on the 3 basic rights of workers, and the new voluntary psychological standard – as well as referring to the text-book on p. 65 (6th ed.) or p. 62 (7th ed.) Kelloway, Kevin E., Francis, Lori, Gatien, Bernadette. (2017). Management of Occupational Health & Safety, Seventh Edition. Nelson Education Ltd.

1. Do you think that worker rights are properly communicated in the workplace? Are psychological rights a natural evolution of basic safety rights or too much to ask of employers? Are there ways that employers can be proactive in providing support?

Explanation / Answer

Dictating employees outside activities completely depends on type of job that an employee is doing for the organisation. If an employee is directly responsible for his wrong doings and it affects the companies brand image by the outside activities of the specific employee then company do have specific guidelines as maintenance of the activity is for the specific employee to maintain the brand image and to successfully be more ethical towards the businesses.
Doing other things are directly responsibility of an employee for his career. Rather than looking for an employee personal life, organisations should focus on his performance. Smoking inside the organisation should be prohibited but if an employee wants to smoke outside the organisation and it does not directly affect the company's image then he has no responsibility of stopping himself from smoking.
For an example if an employee works for an anti smoking Drug Company then he should not be smoking outside the organisation as it would directly affect the company's brand image and would also affect the moral of the company and would send out a wrong message in the society.
Definitely if I am a supervisor and my company ask me to avoid this specific practice outside the organisation then I would be definitely avoiding this is specific term. If I ever saw an employee violating this is specific rule then I would take a strict action against him as it is a part of my duty.
Companies should regulate the balance factor if it directly affects companies brand image regulation on the Wellness of an employee should be done as an awareness programme inside the organisation. It should not be implemented on the street basis as it a directly reduces the employee moral and violet his human Rights. Every employee has its own life and responsible for his own doing in his career and his personal life.
All in all we can see that companies should only a regulate the specific terms which affects its brand image rather than doing gatekeeping on the employees everyday activities. If a company continues to alter and employees daily life then he would definitely be annoyed by the same and would leave the organisation and delay of rate for the organisation would definitely increase.

Related Questions

Navigate

• Browse (All)
• Browse B
• Subjects

Integrity-first tutoring: explanations and feedback only — we do not complete graded work. Learn more.