1. How did the Taft Hartley Act, 1947 impact unionization? Why did unions resist
ID: 418748 • Letter: 1
Question
1. How did the Taft Hartley Act, 1947 impact unionization? Why did unions resist it so fiercely? How are the current “right to work” laws related to this history?
2. Write a short note on the process of the manufacture and sales of a cotton t-shirt and its global supply chain.
3. Summarize the main issues in any one of the campaigns run by each of these organizations: (a) Coalition of Imokalee Workers, (b) the New York Taxi Workers’ Alliance, (c) United Students Against Sweatshops.
4.The ILO’s Global Wage Report states that “in the wake of the financial crisis of 2008–09, global real wage growth started to recover in 2010, but has decelerated since 2012, falling from 2.5 per cent to 1.7 per cent in 2015, its lowest level in four years. If China, where wage growth was faster than elsewhere, is not included, real wage growth has fallen from 1.6 per cent in 2012 to 0.9 per cent in 2015.” What is the reason for this deceleration of real wage growth? Answer using data.
Explanation / Answer
Answer:
Taft Hartley Act, 1947 impact unionization: This law was also known as labor relation management act. This law was passed in 1947 by congress. This law helped in setting the guidelines for correcting the unions unfair labor practices so that it helps the labor and organization. Taft Hartley Act became law despite the veto of President Harry Truman.
This act sets the right level of guidelines for the union of organizations so that unions do not have adverse impact on the organization and also should not have adverse impacts for labors and labor rights as well.
Basically this act balances the organization and labor and the law‘s guideline helps such that the union does not have adverse impacts on the employer and employees/labors.
Thus this act helped in reforming the unions in the nation and released a legal framework in which the unions will operators suitably and does not have adverse impacts on the employer and labors.
Unions resist it so fiercely: Unions resist it so fiercely because this law directly impacted the unions only. Thus the unions regulation and acts were limited by the law and they cannot miss-execute union for their personal interest, as they were doing earlier. This lower down the powers of the unions and union’s structure is not capable to mislead the employer and labors. So this is the reason unions has resisted it and they were against this law.
Current “right to work” laws related to this history: The current law of right to work are related to this act only, because the Taft Hartley Act had set the frame work for right to work initiative so that labor can work with maintaining their legal rights and without misuse by the employers or unions. The current right to work laws are also engaged in setting the right kind of environment and with applicable adequate legal support to labors so that labors cannot be harassed in the working environment and labors are able to receive their legal rights and unions should not miss-influences them and should not push them in wrong direction. Basically the Taft Hartley act was to establish the framework for the right to work initiative.
Related Questions
Navigate
Integrity-first tutoring: explanations and feedback only — we do not complete graded work. Learn more.