Question: On what theory did the franchisees sue Carvel? Question: What must a p

Question

Question: On what theory did the franchisees sue Carvel?

Question: What must a plaintiff prove to win on this theory?

Question: What does economic advantage mean?

Question: How does this tort differ from tortious interference with contract?

Question: What are the elements of tortious interference with contract?

Question: In the Carvel case, what was the basis for the plaintiffs claim of economic advantage? What did Carvel do to upset the plaintiffs?

Question: Did the court agree that this conduct amounted to tortious interference with prospective advantage? Why or why not?

Explanation / Answer

Question: On what theory did the franchisees sue Carvel?

On the theory of Tortiuous interference with prospective advantage did the franchisees sue Carvel with.

Question: What must a plaintiff prove to win on this theory?

It is important for the plaintiff to prove that there was a specific expectation as well as reasonable, attached to avail an economic advantage and that on the part of the defendant, there was an attempt made in an inappropriate way to cause a hindrance to the development of the relationship owing to the undue interference into it.

Question: What does economic advantage mean?

The meaning of an economic advantage is that to derive a benefit in a certain monetary form by virtue of a business relationship in a normal course of affair.

Question: How does this tort differ from tortious interference with contract?

Under the tortuous interference with contract, the plaintiff has a contract with a third party in an obvious state of affair while in case of tortitious interference with contract, the plaintiff have a relationship in the form of certain pre-contractual agreement though not having a contract with such a third party.

Related Questions

Navigate

• Browse (All)
• Browse Q
• Subjects

Integrity-first tutoring: explanations and feedback only — we do not complete graded work. Learn more.