Respond to at least 2 of your peers regarding their point of view, consider the

Question

Respond to at least 2 of your peers regarding their point of view, consider the following questions:

Do you agree or disagree with your peer? Why or why not?

Do you have a different point of view after reading your peer's discussion post? What influenced you to change your point of view?

1/

There is absolutely a difference between management and leadership. As the article states, there is a strong deviation between the goal of management to keep an operation running smoothly and the goal of leadership to enact change and focus. Leadership should be more future or big-picture oriented, while management handles the day to day aspects which get us to that point.

Over the past few decades, there has also been a shift within the workforce which emphasizes the relationship between leadership and general staff, and focuses on personal development and fulfillment of the employees. The rise of leadership which is aimed at aiding employees on their own path to personal fulfillment increases worker satisfaction and thus production within a workforce. This is in opposition to the older view which held workers and managers as the interchangeable parts of a machine which the article discussed.

Lastly, managers are most often given explicit, legitimate roles as such. They are often also leaders, but the potential for leadership exists within any person or relationship, and effective leaders will drive change or commitment without any explicit label authorizing them to do so.

2/

Leadership and Management may have similar qualities in some aspects, however, I believe they are two very different positions and should be treated as such. To me, leadership is less about assigning objectives and more about inspiring your staff. I good leader will be encouraging and provide motivation in order to achieve broader goals. A leader usually supports a mission statement or a vision while a manager deals with day to day tasks.

This is not to say that these two positions do not overlap. Management and Leadership both are superiors of a group of employees. They both intend to guide the company to success. In my opinion however, they achieve this in different ways. They require different skill sets and have a different types of interactions when influencing their support team.

Explanation / Answer

Answer: (1) I agree with the argument made here. There is a vast difference between management and leadership. The managers only manage the affairs but the leaders motivate and bring transformations and changes inside the organization. The leaders use their leadership in order to lead people rather than just managing them. The functions of a manager are limited but the leadership has a large scope. Unlike a manager a leader not only helps the organization to achieve its goals but they also help their followers to develop personally and achieve their personal goals also. Hence leadership is not only different but far more superior as compared to management.

(2) I agree with this post that there is a considerable overlapping between the roles played by a manager and a leader. They both lead others and provide them with guidance. Both of them are responsible for the achievement of the organizational goals and objectives. But at the same time there are also many differences between a leader and a manager which cannot be ignored. The leaders play a broad role in motivating the employees while the managers manage the employees in a limited way. Management is more about managing day to day affairs while leadership motivates at a larger level. Therefore it is required that both these functions are differentiated from each other despite many similarities between them

Related Questions

Navigate

• Browse (All)
• Browse R
• Subjects

Integrity-first tutoring: explanations and feedback only — we do not complete graded work. Learn more.