Academic Integrity: tutoring, explanations, and feedback — we don’t complete graded work or submit on a student’s behalf.

NASA Sysytem Failure Case Study: ‘Two Rods Don’t Make it Right’ And this is the

ID: 395257 • Letter: N

Question

NASA Sysytem Failure Case Study: ‘Two Rods Don’t Make it Right’ And this is the format for it!
Format: In your document, you should write a 1 page reflective document which addresses the following questions. Was there an ethical breach involved in this disaster? o Defend your position. What should have been done differently to prevent the accident? . Describe how a process could be put in place to prevent this types of mistake from happening again o Describe how some elements of the codes of ethics presented in class could have helped prevent this disaster. What were some of the societal consequences of this disaster? What were some of the personal consequences for the engineering firm and the lead engineers on the project? Describe a potential circumstance once you graduate and are working as an engineer where you may find yourself in a similar situation. . . o What are some practical steps that you can take now, and when you begin working as an engineer to prevent this type of disaster from happening as a result of your engineering decisions?

Explanation / Answer

Ethics are the socially acceptable principles of conduct that dictate the actions and behaviors of people in conflicting situations. The accident in this NASA two rod case happened in the Hayat hotel depicts clear breach of ethics.

            Ethics demands that the responsibility of the delegation of the design of the structure and the verification of the design should have been assigned clearly to the new engineers with proper communication. It also demands that the design changes should be communicated tested to make sure that they work in the way original design is planned to work even in the absence of clear responsibility.

            However, in current case, this was not carried out by both the designer (GCE international and the steel contractor Havens. They failed to act ethically by allowing the design approval without proper verification of load caused by connecting the walkways together and led to failure of the walkways causing death of 114 people.        

            They should have carried the design verification after the change to make sure that the new structure is able to take the load correctly and ensure that the communication is prompt and effective in making the information transfer complete.

            Code of ethics could have cleared the situation more by defining the actions and responsibilities under the conflicting situations allowing little scope of breach of the ethics.