in 2 sentences for each question 1) Should data be considered a true corporate r
ID: 3917365 • Letter: I
Question
in 2 sentences for each question
1) Should data be considered a true corporate resource? Why or why not? Compare and contrast data to other corporate resources (capital, plant and equipment, personnel, etc.) in terms of importance, intrinsic value, and modes of use.
2) Defund or refute the following statement: “Data is the most important corporate resource because it describes all of the others.”
3) What are two kinds of data redundancy, and what are the three types of problems that they cause in the information systems environment?
4) What factors might lead to redundant data across multiple files? Is the problem managerial or technical in nature?
5) Describe the apparent tradeoff between data redundancy and data integration in simple linear files.
6) In your own words, describe the key quality of a DBMS that sets it apart from other data handling systems.
Explanation / Answer
Q1) Should data be considered a true corporate resource? Why or why not? Compare and contrast data to other corporate resources (capital, plant and equipment, personnel, etc.) in terms of importance, intrinsic value, and modes of use.
YES, data is a true corporate resource because it is used in the functioning of the company in its efforts to be competitive and to make a profit. Many consider data to be the most important corporate resource because it describes and records the others. Data is as valuable as other corporate resources because today’s companies cannot function without it anymore than they can function without any of the other corporate resources.
Q2) Defund or refute the following statement: “Data is the most important corporate resource because it describes all of the others.”
One can argue that each corporate resource is as important as every other one becausethe company would cease to function without having every corporate resource intact. (A possible exception to this idea is that money can buy access to other resources in an outsourcing sense but this is arguable.) With data mirroring virtually all of today’scorporate activities, the idea that data is a “super resource” that describes and tracks all of the others is a defensible position.
Q3) What are two kinds of data redundancy, and what are the three types of problems that they cause in the information systems environment?
The two kinds of redundancy are redundancy within a single file and redundancy across files. The three problems of both are wasted storage space, extra time to update the data, and the potential for data integrity problems.
Q4) What factors might lead to redundant data across multiple files? Is the problem managerial or technical in nature?
The problem is application development that is done in an independent, uncoordinated manner. This is a symptom of a corporate philosophy that does not encourage (or possibly even discourages) the sharing of data among different corporate departments and, by extension, among different applications. The problem is managerial to the extent that the company does not encourage data sharing. It may be technical, as well, if incompatible hardware and software is used in different parts of the company and this discourages sharing data.
Q5) Describe the apparent tradeoff between data redundancy and data integration in simple linear files.
Having non-redundant data and having well-integrated data are both important, desirable features of corporate data. The problem is that non-redundant files require laborious means to achieve data integration, while physically integrated data (in simple linear files) is inherently redundant
Q6) In your own words, describe the key quality of a DBMS that sets it apart from other data handling systems.
The key quality is the ability to store data non-redundantly while at the same time providing a viable data integration capability.
Please let me know in case of any clarifications required. Thanks!
Related Questions
Navigate
Integrity-first tutoring: explanations and feedback only — we do not complete graded work. Learn more.