While many modern and contemporary philosophers would agree with Descartes that
ID: 3866983 • Letter: W
Question
While many modern and contemporary philosophers would agree with Descartes that there are thoughts (or that there is thinking), a good number of philosophers would disagree that there is a philosophy other than the philosophy of Descartes that can make a legitimate attempt at solving the problem of the self. there is an essential self that is having thoughts. there is a philosophy other than the philosophy of Hume that can make a legitimate attempt at solving the problem of the self. none of the above To say that I can know what is going on in other people's minds by analogy is to say that because I can observe certain similarities between me and other people, it means that we must all be robots. because I cannot observe any similarities between me and other people, it must be God that makes us similar. because I cannot observe any similarities between me and other people, we must all be exactly alike. because I can observe certain similarities between me and other people, additional similarities must also exist between me and other people. In functionalism, it is impossible for a computer to be an exact duplicate of the brain. the whole person is taken into consideration. the functions of mental activity seem to be what is most important to solving the mind-body problem, but it is really just at the material of the brain that is significant. the processes of mental activity are what explain the special nature of mental events.Explanation / Answer
Option C
René Descartes is regularly credited with being the "Father of Modern Philosophy."This title is legitimized due both to his break with the customary Scholastic-Aristotelian theory predominant at his chance and to his advancement and advancement of the new, robotic sciences.His basic break with Scholastic logic was twofold.First, Descartes imagined that the Scholastics' strategy was inclined to question given their dependence on sensation as the hotspot for all knowledge.Second, he needed to supplant their last causal model of logical clarification with the more present day, unthinking model.
5.Option C
other individuals can't realize that I am in torment when I am in torment - is false.If we take "know" is as it is regularly utilized, at that point it is consistent with say that other individuals can and every now and again do know when I am in pain.Indeed, in situations where the torment is outrageous, it is frequently difficult to keep others from knowing this notwithstanding when one wishes to do so.Thus, in specific conditions, it would not be unordinary to hear it commented of somebody, for instance, that "a groan of agony got away him" - demonstrating that regardless of his endeavors, he couldn't however show his torment to others.It hence comes to pass that neither proposition (i) nor (ii) is valid.
6.Option D
Functionalism is a hypothesis about the idea of mental states.As per functionalism, mental states are recognized by what they do instead of by what they are made of.This can be comprehended by contemplating ancient rarities like mousetraps and keys.In specific, the first inspiration for functionalism originates from the accommodating correlation of psyches with computers.But that is just a similarity.
Related Questions
Navigate
Integrity-first tutoring: explanations and feedback only — we do not complete graded work. Learn more.