\"In your present choices, include the future wholeness of Man among the objects

Question

"In your present choices, include the future wholeness of Man among the objects of your will" (Jonas 2012 p. 127). Given, technologies have increased exponentially; we need to ponder how our present abilities to create new technologies will impact the wholeness of men. Today we have the ability to clone sheep, create life outside the human body, create artificial intelligence, solar power our homes, etc. We have technology that will allow us to deposit a check without ever going to the bank. We have the ability to have face to face conversations from the opposite side of the world. You can now get a college education in the remotest villages in the world. I would like you to think about the implications of possibilities. Contemplate where you think we move moral to immoral or ethical to unethical. Be sure to think about the underlying values that help you draw that line for yourself. In other words, take a deontological approach. Remember that deontology is the branch of philosophy concerned with ethics, especially that branch dealing with duty, moral obligation, and right action. Deontology falls within the domain of moral theories that guide and assess our choices of what we ought to do (deontic theories). Prompt: Discuss the following: Just because you can should we? How far should technology take us? Why? or Why not? Where does technology cross the line? Does it have the power to do us more harm than good?

Explanation / Answer

In moral philosophy world, deontology contains normative theories which choices are morally required, forbidden.Deontology falls within moral theories. The domain of moral theories which assess our choices, deontologists—those who subscribe to deontological theories.Some of the ethical theories are:

Consequentialists:
Consequentialists differ widely in specifying the Good or bad. Suppose identify the Good with happiness, satisfaction in some other sense and also bad in sorrow. Conventional utilitarians add each person's share of the Good to achieve maximization.

And also there are some consequentialists that are holding from doing, of certain kinds of acts which are valuable states of affairs.But none of these positions clear the difference between consequentialism and deontology.With the essence of consequentialism an action would be right only insofar as it maximizes these Good-making states.There are some consequentialists differ from Good consists. Generally they agree that the Good is agent-neutral.Hence valuable affairs are agents have reason to achieve.

Deontological theories:
While comparing with consequentialist theories, deontological theories judge the morality of choices. The most familiar forms presenting the greatest contrast to consequentialism.These deontological accounts of morality cannot make certain wrongful choices. For such deontologists,make choice right is its conformity. These are simply obeyed by each moral agent. The Right is said to have priority over the Good.Deontologists generally supplement obligations with non-consequentialist permissions So that certain actions are right even not maximizing of good consequences.

Related Questions

Navigate

• Browse (All)
• Browse #
• Subjects

Integrity-first tutoring: explanations and feedback only — we do not complete graded work. Learn more.