Ethical Dilemma Sarah Kovacs supervises a team of ten employees in the human res

Question

Ethical Dilemma Sarah Kovacs supervises a team of ten employees in the human resources department of Paddington, Inc. She strives to match each member of her team's strengths with appropriate tasks, and for the last five years, Sarah has created a plcasant working environment for everyone The newest member of her team, Kim Evans, excels at meeting deadlines an d works at a level ve her peers. However, since she was hired a year ago, Kim has managed to find probles downsides to everything, and never fails to share her moody nit-p points out legitimate issues that need to be dealt with, but she does it with an air of negativity as misery that stymies the team's enthusiasm and puts Sarab in a challenging position from which to motivate her team. Sarah's frustration has become difficult to contain, and meetings with Ki have not produced any change in her attitude cking with others Often, Kim Last week in her supervisor's meeting, Sarah became aware of a position opening up in the marketing department that requires the skills at which Kim excels. The position hasn't been advertised yet, but Sarah thinks that she could fast-track Kim into an interview. However, Sarah knows that Kim's negative affect will possibly be an even greater problem t the marketing department, because of that team's interaction with Paddington's clientele. N only could Kim sour her new team's relationships, she could pass that negativity onto curre and potential clients. Of course, Sarah's never seen Kim dealing with clients-Kim may ha ability to set aside her negative outlook when necessary. But she's certainly seen Kim oper criticize Paddington's policies to her peers and in front of Sarah and other managers. She' Kim complain about workloads, vacation time, cafeteria food, the weather But, if Kim gets the position on the marketing team, the HR team could begin to function like a cohesive group with focus and vision. Sarah is not sure what would be best for Pad and her department or what she should do. Questions: 1. Using utilitarian, virtue-based, Kant's and Justice Based ethical theories, evaluate options 2. What should Sarah do? Why?

Explanation / Answer

1.
As per the utilitarian approach of ethics, the appointment of Kim to the new position will bring cohesion, synergy and other benefits. That is good for the majority of the employees in the organization and client. Hence, it is ethical if Kim is appointed. Virtue ethics observes the character of the person that is clean in case of Kim. It will bring transparency to the marketing profile for what the Kim is being considered. Hence her appointment is justified. Kim has a negativity towards some of the policies that are not good. But, it only leads the organization to improve and become better than before.
As per the Kant's ethical approach, the intention of the decision to appoint Kim as well as the approach of the Kim is for the betterment of the organization. So, appointing Kim into the new position is morally right decision. On the basis of justice ethics, the appointment should be based upon the equity and fair. At this point, Kim excels in her work and a good choice for the position. So, she can be shortlisted for the profile.

2.
Sarah should appoint Kim to the new position because it will bring the excellence and legitimacy to the work in marketing. Though Kim has a negativity in approach at certain instances, but she can be counselled to work in such a way, that constructive criticism at internal level takes place and the organization grows. After all, Kim also understands to add value at the organization rather loss.

Related Questions

Navigate

• Browse (All)
• Browse E
• Subjects

---

---

Integrity-first tutoring: explanations and feedback only — we do not complete graded work. Learn more.