Select one of the areas of HR that you’d like to research more: Recruiting Train
ID: 374816 • Letter: S
Question
Select one of the areas of HR that you’d like to research more:
Recruiting
Training and Development
Compensation
Benefits
Safety and Security
Diversity
Write an analysis paper of 800 – 850 words. Find three articles (no more than two years old) that discuss issues relevant to the HR area that you selected. In your own words, summarize and consolidate the main ideas of the articles. What are the future trends and developments of this area? As a leader and manager in the health care field, how might you make an impact on this human resource management area in the future?
Your articles must come from these resources:
HR Report: http://www.hrmreport.com
Business and Legal Resources HR: https://hr.blr.com
HR World: http://hr.toolbox.com
Explanation / Answer
Advantages of Group Decision Making
Group decision building gives two advantages over decisions create by individuals: synergy and sharing of information. Synergy is the idea that the whole is greater than the sum of its parts. When a group reaches a decision collectively, its judgment can be keener than that of any of its members.
Through discussion, questioning, and collaboration, group members can know more complete and robust solutions and character.
The sharing of information among group members is a different advantage of the group decision-making process. Group decisions take into account a full scope of information since each group member may contribute unusual information and expertise. deal information can develop understanding, explain issues, and help movement toward a collective decision.
Disadvantages of Group Decision Making
Diffusion of Responsibility
One possible problem of group decision-making is that it can produce a diffusion of responsibility that occur in a lack of accountability for outcomes. In a sense, if everybody is responsible for a decision, then no one is. furthermore, group decisions can make it carefully for members to deny private responsibility and blame another for effective decisions.
Lower Efficiency
Group decisions can also be mean efficient than those made by an individual. Group decisions can take extra time because there is the element of participation, discussion, and coordination with group members. Without good facilitation and structure, meetings can take bogged down in small details that may mean a lot to one person but not to the others.
Groupthink
One of the high inhibitors of active group decision making is groupthink. Groupthink is a psychological phenomenon that happen within a group of people in which the passion for harmony or conformity results in an irrational or dysfunctional decision-making outcome. By isolating themselves from external influences and actively suppressing dissenting position in the interest of minimizing conflict, group members join a consent decision without critical evaluation of choice viewpoints.
Loyalty to the group want individuals to withdraw raising controversial stocks or alternative solutions, and there is a damage of individual creativity, uniqueness, and independent thinking. The dysfunctional group dynamics of the in-group present an illusion of invulnerability. Thus the in-group significantly overrates its own decision-making abilities and significantly underestimate the abilities of its enemy (the out-group). Furthermore, groupthink can play dehumanizing claim against the out-group.
Related Questions
drjack9650@gmail.com
Navigate
Integrity-first tutoring: explanations and feedback only — we do not complete graded work. Learn more.