1.The operator definitely has a legal responsibility to notify the police becaus
ID: 374030 • Letter: 1
Question
1.The operator definitely has a legal responsibility to notify the police because the email stands as a witness to anything that might happen in the near future.As a responsible citizen it is his rightful duty to inform the police about the mail he has received from John.If John had not contacted the operator in any case then he is not legally responsible as he is not notified about th8ngs happening between two individuals.
2.The first duty of the operator is to legally contact the police regarding the email.After that if John wishes the operator can give the address of Sally to John so that he can also alert the police regarding the threatening mail.John should be more involved in the case as more things are happening between John and Sally.
3.The husband of Sally cannot legally claim against the operator if it is proved to be a prank played by Sally because the mail is sent from the husband's mail is which is a very important fact.If the mail is proved to be a prank by Sally then she is the person responsible for all the happenings. She should be strictly warned and if too much consequences had happened then she is the person to be punished.
4.As the theory of a good Samaritan the operator is supposed to alert the local police.It can be either way around.if it was only a prank then the issue can be solved very easily bout in the other case of happens the next day that Sally is killed them the loss is irreparable at any cost.So the operator has to definitely notify the police whatever the case may be the next day.And another reason is that only the operator has Sally address and no one else. So he is completely responsible for tgeaction to.be taken in this case.
Explanation / Answer
John and Sally "meet" on a bulletin board provided by a commercial network operator and then begin corresponding through e-mail. The operator has a "standard' set of acceptable use policies that prohibit sending (through e-mail) or posting (on either type of bulletin board) any 'defamatory, obscene, threatening, sexually explicit, ethnically offensive, or illegal material." John receives a private e-mail note from Sally's husband saying: "I know what's going on between you two, and I'm not putting up with it. It's too late to save her. She's a gonner" John notifies the operator and forwards a copy of this note, requesting that the operator notify the local police in Sally's home town (since John has no way of knowing where Sally lives). Questions Does the operator have any legal responsiblity to notify the police? If John had not contacted the operator, would it have any liability or responsibility? Should the operator provide John with Sally's address so he can notify the police if he wishes? sband, only to find out that a prank was played If the operator decides to notify the police and they arrest the hu by Sally, does the husband have any claim against the operator? If the operator decides not to notify, te police and it turns out that Sally was killed by her husband a day after John notified the operator, does the operator have any liability to Sally's heirs? How do "Good Samaritan" laws apply in this case?
Related Questions
Navigate
Integrity-first tutoring: explanations and feedback only — we do not complete graded work. Learn more.