2 Chapter 13 his posi bsP nto the opening of the shredder.\" ion that Madalyn\'s

Question

2 Chapter 13 his posi bsP nto the opening of the shredder." ion that Madalyn's fingers were "pinched and Product Advertising and Liability 477 CASE QUESTIONS For the foregoing reasons, the Court concludes that tiffs have introduced evidence such that there 1. Explain the theory of the plaintiffs' expert as to Paa ury question as to whether Defendants were 2. What is the impact of the evidence that no one how the paper shredder was defective. aalicent in designing the MailMate Paper Shredder. is really sure how Madalyn's hand got into the Defendants' Motion is DENIED as to Plaintiffs' negli- gence and strict liability-design defect claims. shredder? 3. Do you think Amy was negligent in her conduct? Ethical Issu n 1994, a group of Chrysler engineers metThe following evidence came out in the rs

Explanation / Answer

In the context of the given question,

1. The section of Judicial Opinion in the case study explains that Plaintiffs' claimed a defective shredder design for the incident. They reported that the shredder had a very broad opening for the fingers to enter cutting slots, and the blades were just 1.25 inches below the inlet slot which is risky as children's fingers can easily enter the machine. Moreover, they claim the shedder to have an inexpensive design style which lacked safety features for its users.

2. To the end of the case, the Court dismisses Plaintiffs' claim of the shredder having a negligent design style without children protection features, it is very ambiguous which party is to be accused. As Amy and Madalyn are already victims and CED Technologies denies any design defects, it is very difficult to grip the accused and take legal action on them. this will delay any further judicial action to penalize the accused and bring justice to the accused.

3. In my opinion, yes Amy was negligent to allow Madalyn to be around her while she was using the shredding machine and then holding her in her arms while operating the machine. This is definitely a violation of safety policies by Amy while using an electric machine having a high risk.

Related Questions

Navigate

• Browse (All)
• Browse 2
• Subjects

---

---

Integrity-first tutoring: explanations and feedback only — we do not complete graded work. Learn more.