1.) In the “insulin sensitivity” section of the results section, what is incorre
ID: 3518623 • Letter: 1
Question
1.) In the “insulin sensitivity” section of the results section, what is incorrect in the first two sentences? (1 point)
2.) How do you know that your answer to question 1 is correct? (1 point)
3.) In the “glucose tolerance” section of the results section the authors wrote “The AUC for the N-10 group was significantly greater than both the R-16 and the R-10 groups, with the R-6 group being intermediate (Fig. 6).” What is incorrect in this quoted sentence? (1 point)
4.) . In the “T-maze test” section of the results section, what is incorrect in those three sentences? (1 point)
5.) How do you know that your answer to question 4 is correct? (1 point)
6.) In the “brain histology” section of the results section, what is incorrect in those two sentences? (1 point)
7.) How do you know that your answer to question6 is correct? (1 point)
Insulin sensitivity Fasting blood glucose on d50 was similar in all four groups (p-0.07). When expressed as the area under the curve (AUC), the two catch-up groups, R-6 (7635 ??89, n-23) and R-10 (7531 147,n-38), had significantly higher AUC than the R-16 group (6870+119,n -58), while the N-10 group was intermediate betveen the others (7229+132, n-47) (Fig. 5). Similar patterns were seen for the AtUC between 0 and 30 min and between 30 and 120 min. When individual time-points were considered, the R-6 and R-10 groups had higher blood glucose concentrations than the other groups (N-10 and R-16) at 30, 45 and 60 min Eg.5 Percentage of watar, protein, fat, and ahfor ach study group at de0. Error bars represens mean When the data were examined as change in glucose concentration from baseline, the area under baseline (AUE) between 0 and 30 min was significantly greater for the N-10 group (593 43, n-47) than for the R-6 group (387 61, n-58), while the R-10 (42848, n- 38) and R-16 groups (489 37,n-58) were intermediate betrveen the tvo. There were no differences in AUE among the groups for the time period 30 min to 120 min Glucose tolerance Fasting blood glucose on d55 was significantly affected by sex (M> Fp-0.0061) and by group (p. 0.0022). Fasting glucose was lower in the N-10(99.0% 1.4 mgL) and the R-16 (99.1+ 1.3 mgL) groups than in the R-10 group (1053 1.5mgL), with the R-6 group being intermediate between them (102.8+2.0 mgL). The AUC was significantiy different bettveen groups (p-0.0079) and ivas greater in. males than females -0.06). The AuC for the N-10 group (10778 413,n-47) was significantly greater than both the R-16 (9210 36, n-59) and the R-10 (8819 453,n- 39) groups, with the R-6 group being intermediate (9620 577, n-24) (Fig. 5. There were no significant group effects betiveen 0 and 30 min, but were seen subsequently during the remainder of the GII for the time period 30 to 180 min. A similar patterrn was seen in ALTE amonz the roups. Eg. 6 Edood glucose during an intraperitoneal nauln tolarance te T a a50. Fasing blood guccas was stmilar in all four groups Error bars represent 1 SEs4, f not viitble tha are smaller than the plot symbalExplanation / Answer
1. The figure 5 does not indicate the blood glucose levels in the four groups. It is a bar graph showing the percentage content of water, ash, protein and fat in the four groups; N10, R-6, R-10 and R-16 groups. This graph does not indicate fasting glucose levels.
2. The fasting blood glucose levels in the four groups are indicated by a curve graph wherein the blood sugar levels are measured over time. The area under the curve can be measured only in a curve graph. Fig 5 is a bar graph.
3. According to Fig 6, there is no significant difference between the fasting glucose levels in the four groups N10, R-6, R-10 and R-16. However, the results indicated that the AUC for N10 group was significantly higher than R-16 and R-10. The R-6 group has intermediate AUC. The figure 6 results do not correlate with the results indicated in this section. Figure 6 actually matches the results shown in first two lines of insulin insensitivity results.
4. T-maze results indicate that memory and learning was better in N-10 group than any other group. However, the figure 7 is not a graph of memory and learning in these groups.
5. The figure 7 is a graph of blood glucose levels vs time. They indicate that fasting blood glucose is affected by sex and by group. The area under the curve was significantly different between N-10 and R-16/R-10 groups. The Figure 7 represents results shown for Glucose tolerance results. No statistical analysis was performed that could indicate whether N-10 has a significantly higher AC than R-16 and R-10.
6. Figure 8 represents results of T-maze test,. It does not represent the results of brain histology. No histology is shown in Figure 8, indicating area of MEF-fibers.
7. There should have been brain histology pictures shown in figure 8. The images should have indicates areas containing MEF fibers in the four groups. Fig 8 is a graph of success of T-Maze in four groups. There is no statistical significance shown. Hence, it cannot be said that T-Maze test was more successful in N-10 group.
The figures of all the tests do not match the explanation shown.
Related Questions
Navigate
Integrity-first tutoring: explanations and feedback only — we do not complete graded work. Learn more.