into the obstacles every time. Based oh these resuils, the duthts codd the adept
ID: 3502409 • Letter: I
Question
into the obstacles every time. Based oh these resuils, the duthts codd the adeptness of the blind in avoiding obstacles is due primarily to their use of auditory cues and not to any facial vision." EXAMPLE Asch (1952) conducted an experiment to determine if the first information you receive about another person is more important in forming an impression of that person than later information (primacy effect), or if later information is more important (recency effect). Asch used two groups of subjects. A series of adjec- tives which were said to describe a certain person were read to both groups; however, one group received positive information first and negative information last, while the second group received negative information first and positive infor- mation last. The adjectives (and order) read to the group receiving positive informa- tion first were intelligent, industrious, impulsive, critical, stubborn, and envious The group receiving the negative information first were read the same list but in reverse order. Asch then asked the subjects to write down their general impression of the person. The group receiving the positive information first described him as an able person who had certain shortcomings. The group receiving the negative information first described him as a "problem" whose abilities were hampered by serious difficulties. Since the group that received the positive information f tended to have a positive evaluation of the stimulus person, and the group that received the negative information first tended to have a negative evaluation, Asch irst eorExplanation / Answer
Note: This response is in UK English, please paste the response to MS Word and you should be able to spot discrepancies easily. You may elaborate the answer based on personal views or your classwork if necessary. Also, since you haven’t described an exercise or question, I will explain the experiment posted above.
(Answer) Solomon Asch was a Polish psychologist who conducted several behavioural experiments in order to better understand the dynamics of a basic human being. One of his experiments was that of the “Primary Effect” and the “Recency Effect.”
Through this experiment, Asch proved his hypothesis that human beings tend to value the prominent information they receive first about a human being and consequently undervalue the proceeding information. In order to prove the hypothesis, he took two groups of people. One group had the good qualities about a person described first and then the bad qualities. The second group conversely had the bad qualities described first and then the good qualities.
Upon a review, the group that was told about the good qualities presumed the person to be good with a few bad qualities and the group that received the bad qualities first assumed that the person was primarily bad. This is how he proved the “primary effect” by showing how the information received in the primary stages had a greater impact than the information that was later received about a person.
The opposite “recency effect” is when we get to know a person deeply, we judge them by their words, actions and overall behaviour and temperament. We may evaluate people more prominently and profoundly after considering several aspects of their personality. This is when the first impressions we have had of them might become futile and merely a small or negligible aspect of their personality. This is known as the recency effect because it is based on judgements from recently acquired information. For example, a boss might get to know the employee better after a few months of work than at the first interview.
Related Questions
Navigate
Integrity-first tutoring: explanations and feedback only — we do not complete graded work. Learn more.