1.Brandenburg v. Ohio remains the governing case for political speech questions,
ID: 3501304 • Letter: 1
Question
1.Brandenburg v. Ohio remains the governing case for political speech questions, stating that nearly all political speech.
is protected unless it constitutes direct incitement.
is unlawful under the First Amendment.
is subject to the Smith Act.
in some way advocates violence against the government.
must be approved by local authorities
Why did the framers eventually decide to add a bill of rights?
They hoped it would end opposition to the Constitution.
Rhode Island refused to ratify the Constitution without one.
They realized that the Constitution created an extremely weak government.
The Supreme Court ordered it.
Their settlement with the British required it
a.is protected unless it constitutes direct incitement.
b.is unlawful under the First Amendment.
c.is subject to the Smith Act.
d.in some way advocates violence against the government.
e.must be approved by local authorities
Explanation / Answer
a. Is protected unless it constitutes direct incitement as the soeeches are protected under anonymity D. The supreme court ordered it as after the orders the framers came to a mutual law
Related Questions
Navigate
Integrity-first tutoring: explanations and feedback only — we do not complete graded work. Learn more.