Academic Integrity: tutoring, explanations, and feedback — we don’t complete graded work or submit on a student’s behalf.

research method question 5. Two candidates are running against each other for a

ID: 3500094 • Letter: R

Question

research method question

5. Two candidates are running against each other for a seat on the city commission. You would like to obtain a valid measurement of which candidate has more preelection support among the residents of your community. Your operational measure: Obtain a precise count of bumper stickers on vehicles parked at a nearby shopping mall. The candidate with a greater number of bumper stickers will be measured as having greater preelection support than the candidate having fewer bumper stickers. A. This measurement strategy has low face validity, because it clearly measures unintended characteristics-characteristics other than preelection support for the two candidates escribe two reasons why the measurement strategy will not produce a valid measurement of residents' preelection support for the candidates. B. Putting your bumper-sticker counting days behind you, you resolve to develop a more valid measurement of preelection support for the candidates. Describe a measurement strategy that would produce a valid measure of preelection support for candidates running for election.

Explanation / Answer

A measurement strategy is an plan that organizes the business goal & how it will be measured & the intuitive performances measures SPM creates a common language among all parts of the organization that can interact transparently and effectively, thus helping to break down silos. SPM has four factors: (1) Aligning & cascading strategic objectives down to day-to-day operational goals; (2) Developing balanced scorecards for reporting; (3) Making reporting easier and focusing on “metrics that matter”; (4) Testing & validating operational &strategic decisions.

Choosing the right metrics track is the main key to sucessful SPM implementation .Some common challanges that company conforts while trying to put strategy such as ineffective comunication , an excess of data & the need for executive buy-in, along with the possible solutions

As the world companies continue to grow - the others are entering a period , where many companies are trying for acost cutting agenda to a growth focused , capabilities -building agenda But for any new growth strategy to succeed, all levels of the organization must clearly understand enterprise & corporate goals, how they cascade down to individual executive goals, & the strategy to achieve those goals. Senior leaders are expected — & need — to make fact-based decisions at all levels of the value chain, & align incentives across the organization& achieve traction against strategic objectives. The need need for execution in mind, executives should consider strategic performance measurement (SPM), an approach that makes an organization’s strategic goals more transparent to line executives & provides an ongoing mechanism to monitor the achievement of these goals through simple, intuitive performance measures.Besides providing a common taxonomy, SPM offers the advantage of agility. A company can shed old metrics &adopt new ones as goals change, such as targeting a new market Metrics too often become hardwired into an organization and continue to be tracked even when they no longer capture.

. Metrics need to balance visibility into both current & future performance. They should also be “benchmarkable” so senior leaders can compare performance across client segments, products, divisions, & even against peers. , Ideally, the company should start with focusing on metrics that can be collected with existing or easy-to-implement processes and systems. SPM should not require a wholesale technology overhaul; indeed, ease of implementation is one of its major benefits.

B) In multiple state wide elections the citizens exhibits large differences in their expections of elections out come.Expections are very strong & the persons tend to belive taht their preffered candidate is likely to win the electionsThese findings contribute evidence on the false consensus effect, the regularity that own preferences tend to be positively associated with perceptions of social preferences Unique measures of preferences & perceptions that enabled respondents to express uncertainty flexibly. A setting that would a priori seem inhospitable to false consensus—one where persons have little private information on social preferences but substantial common knowledge provided by media reports of election polls.

The common knowledge is provided by polls, which offer considerable public data about the voting intentions of the electorate. With extensive common &scant private knowledge, one might predict that persons would tend to have similar expectations, or at least that expectations would not vary systematically. Contrary, it is observed large differences in expectations of election outcomes, which are strongly positively associated with candidate prefences

As mentioned in the question about putting bumper stickers of pre elections is not a vaild measurement as the workers of the candidate pastes the stickers but it all depends on the percentage of voters have chosen the to give their votes the measurement stratgeies are however mentioned in the above paragraphs.