1. Critically evaluated the traditional, common claim that the general public pe
ID: 3492042 • Letter: 1
Question
1. Critically evaluated the traditional, common claim that the general public perceives white collar crime to be less serious than conventional crime. What specific methodological questions can be raised about research on this question? Which specific factors have contributed to a growth in the perception that white collar crime is relatively serious?
2. What are the specific difficulties involved in measuring the amount and cost of white collar crime relatives such measurements applied to conventional crime? Which generalizations, if any, about the amount and cost of white collar crime do you regard as reliable? Discuss the concepts of indirect costs and residual costs of white collar crime. From the book "Trusted Criminals" by David O. Friedrichs.
Explanation / Answer
Ans 1;
Generally the public regards the white collar crimes done by the elite class of the society , the less serious ones , as compared to the other conventional crimes. This is due to the reason that they believe that , these crimes are done by the rich people for their greed or some personal corporate gains. Most of the victims even do not come into light due to shame that they have been victimized by such a crime.
Whenever a person is robbed or assaulted , he is likely to come and report for the offender , unlike the ones victimized by such white collar crimes , even though the impact of later is higher that the former in the long run.
Related Questions
Navigate
Integrity-first tutoring: explanations and feedback only — we do not complete graded work. Learn more.