Some argue that animal research is inherently flawed in terms of being ethical b

Question

Some argue that animal research is inherently flawed in terms of being ethical because unlike human participants, animals do not consent to be involved in research. Do you agree with this perspective? Given that animals do not consent to be involved in research projects, what sorts of extra precautions should be taken to ensure that they receive the most humane treatment possible? Some argue that animal research is inherently flawed in terms of being ethical because unlike human participants, animals do not consent to be involved in research. Do you agree with this perspective? Given that animals do not consent to be involved in research projects, what sorts of extra precautions should be taken to ensure that they receive the most humane treatment possible?

Explanation / Answer

Animals do not have voices unlike human beings, thus, it is assumable that their consent is not involved. However, this adds an added responsibility on the researcher. The researcher must not torture the animal, or hurt it any way. It must be treated as a subject for the research project just like human participants. They must be treated with utmost care. No dangerous substances must be administered. The most important thing that researchers must keep in mind during the process of research, is to treat animals like human participants.

Related Questions

Navigate

• Browse (All)
• Browse S
• Subjects

---

---

Integrity-first tutoring: explanations and feedback only — we do not complete graded work. Learn more.