Ford\'s cost-benefit analysis argued that Ford should make an $11-per-car improv

Question

Ford's cost-benefit analysis argued that Ford should make an $11-per-car improvement that would prevent 180 fiery deaths a year. Select one: O True O False After doing a cost-benefit analysis, Ford decided a human life was worth: Select one or more: a. $100,000 b. $200,000 c.$500,000 d. $1 million e. $10 million Which of the following safety alterations were made to the fuel system in the mass-produced Pinto? Select one or more: a. An inexpensive, light-weight plastic baffle was placed between the front of the gas tank and the differential housing b. A piece of steel was placed between the tank and the bumper. C. The gas tank was lined with a rubber bladder d. All of the above e. None of the above

Explanation / Answer

1. The answer is True. 11$ per car improvement was analysed to prevent the deaths.

2. Your chosen response is correct.

3. The answer is E, none of the above. Ford ended up recalling many cars and did not make any alterations in them.

Related Questions

Navigate

• Browse (All)
• Browse F
• Subjects

---

---

Integrity-first tutoring: explanations and feedback only — we do not complete graded work. Learn more.