Question P25: You have asked your administrative assistant, Cindy, to run a regr
ID: 3376287 • Letter: Q
Question
Question P25: You have asked your administrative assistant, Cindy, to run a regression with your weekly departmental expenditure for several years against various tasks that have been completed but with no direct expenditure amount. Cindy runs regression 1 and reports the first part of the results in the table below. Cindy runs a second regression in which she included some more variables that she had initially forgotten to include. Regression2 0.96543 0.932054 0.931778 Regression 1 0.965577 0.932338 0.9319250.286329 0.286021 Multiple R R Square Adjusted R Square Standard Error Observations 495 495 You are immediately suspicious of Cindy's report because: (a) (b) (c) (d) (e) Multiple R-squared went down The adjusted R-squared went down Both (a) and (b) The number of observations did hot change Cindy is a psychopath and shouldn't be trustedExplanation / Answer
When we add new variables to a Regression Model,
In Regression 1 the value of R-squared is 0.93238 , and the value of R-squared in Regression 2 is 0.932054.
Without loss of generality, the value should increase when new variables are added. However, in Cindy's case the value decreases. So, Cindy's report is suspicious.
Related Questions
Hire Me For All Your Tutoring Needs
Integrity-first tutoring: clear explanations, guidance, and feedback.
Drop an Email at
drjack9650@gmail.com
drjack9650@gmail.com
Navigate
Integrity-first tutoring: explanations and feedback only — we do not complete graded work. Learn more.