Academic Integrity: tutoring, explanations, and feedback — we don’t complete graded work or submit on a student’s behalf.

During the global recession of 2008 and 2009 there were many accusations of unet

ID: 3354841 • Letter: D

Question

During the global recession of 2008 and 2009 there were many accusations of unethical behaviour by Wall Street executives financial managers and other corporate officers. At the time and article appeared that suggested that part of the reason for such unethical business behaviour might stems from the fact the cheating has become more prevalent among business students. The article reported that 52% of business students admitted to cheating at sometime during the Academy carrier as compare to 45% of non-business students. Cheating has been a concern of the Dean of the School of business and economics at home Sunil Rivers University for several years. Some faculty members in the school believe the cheating is more prevalent AT TRU then at other universities while other faculty members think the cheating is not a major problem at the school. To resolve some of the issues the DeanCommissioned a study to assess the current unethical behaviour of business students of TRU. And part of as part of the study and anonymous exit survey was administered to sample of 100 business students from this years graduating class responses to the following questions were used to obtain the data regarding three types of cheating. Answer the following :

Use descriptive statistics to summarise the data and comment on your findings

Develop 95% confidence interval for the proportion of all students, the proportion of male students and the proportion of female students who were involved in some type of cheating.

Conducted test to deter mine is the proportion of business students at TRU who were involved in some type of cheating is less than that of business students at other institutions as reported in the article.

Conductor hypothesis test to deter mine is a portion of business students of TRU were involved in some form of cheating is less than that of non-business students at other institutions as reported in the article.

what advice would you give the Dean based upon your analysis of the data?

Explanation / Answer

(p - Z*sqrt(p*(1-p)/n) ,p + Z*sqrt(p*(1-p)/n)

last column give 95% confidence interval for the proportion of all students, the proportion of male students and the proportion of female students who were involved in some type of cheating

Critial value for 95% 1.96 Margin of error Copied from Internet Copied on test Collaborated on Individual Project Cheating of Any Type All Students 0.1002 0.1033 0.1029 0.07264 Females 0.1493 0.1530 0.1526 0.108209 Males 0.1350 0.1397 0.1393 0.0980 Confidence Interval Copied from Internet Copied on test Collaborated on Individual Project Cheating of Any Type All Students Lower Bound 0.2778 0.4077 0.4411 0.7829 Upper Bound 0.4782 0.6143 0.6469 0.9281 Females Lower Bound 0.2407 0.3350 0.3844 0.7454 Upper Bound 0.5393 0.6410 0.6896 0.9618 Males Lower Bound 0.2320 0.3913 0.4117 0.7591 Upper Bound 0.5020 0.6707 0.6903 0.9551
Hire Me For All Your Tutoring Needs
Integrity-first tutoring: clear explanations, guidance, and feedback.
Chat Now And Get Quote