Academic Integrity: tutoring, explanations, and feedback — we don’t complete graded work or submit on a student’s behalf.

A gender-selection technique is designed to increase the likelihood that a baby

ID: 3338662 • Letter: A

Question

A gender-selection technique is designed to increase the likelihood that a baby will be a girl. In the results of the gender-selection technique,

893893

births consisted of

448448

baby girls and

445445

baby boys. In analyzing these results, assume that boys and girls are equally likely.a. Find the probability of getting exactly

448448

girls in

893893

births.b. Find the probability of getting

448448

or more girls in

893893

births. If boys and girls are equally likely, is

448448

girls in

893893

births unusually high?

c. Which probability is relevant for trying to determine whether the technique is effective: the result from part (a) or the result from part (b)?

d. Based on the results, does it appear that the gender-selection technique is effective?

a.

The

probability of getting exactly

448448

girls in

893893

births is

nothing.

(Round to four decimal places as needed.)

b.

The

probability of getting

448448

or more girls in

893893

births is

nothing.

(Round to four decimal places as needed.)

If boys and girls are equally likely, is

448448

girls in

893893

births unusually high?

A.

No, because

448448

girls in

893893

births is not far from what is expected, given the probability of having a girl or a boy.

B.

No, because

448448

girls in

893893

births is far from what is expected, given the probability of having a girl or a boy.

C.

Yes, because

448448

girls in

893893

births is far from what is expected, given the probability of having a girl or a boy.

D.

Yes, because

448448

girls in

893893

births is not far from what is expected, given the probability of having a girl or a boy.

c. Which probability is relevant for trying to determine whether the technique is effective, the result from part (a) or the result from part (b)?

A.

The result from part (a) is more relevant, because one wants the probability of a result that is exactly equal to the one obtained.

B.

The result from part (b) is more relevant, because one wants the probability of a result that is at least as extreme as the one obtained.

C.

Neither of the results are relevant.

D.

The results from part (a) and part (b) are equal, so they are equally relevant.

d. Based on the results, does it appear that the gender-selection technique is effective?

A.

NoNo,

because the probability of having

448448

or more girls in

893893

births

isnbsp unlikely,

and thus,

isnbsp attributable

to random chance.

B.

YesYes,

because the probability of having

448448

or more girls in

893893

births

isnbsp unlikely,

and thus,

isnbsp not nbsp not attributable

to random chance.

C.

NoNo,

because the probability of having

448448

or more girls in

893893

births

isnbsp not nbsp not unlikely,

and thus,

isnbsp attributable

to random chance.

D.

YesYes,

because the probability of having

448448

or more girls in

893893

births

isnbsp not nbsp not unlikely,

and thus,

isnbsp not nbsp not attributable

to random chance.

Explanation / Answer

(a) probability of getting exactly 448448 girls in 893893 = 448448/893893 = 50.17%

(b) probability of getting 448448 or more girls in 893893 births = 50.17%

No birth is almost equal likely it's not unusually high

(c) The results from part (a) and part (b) are equal, so they are equally relevant.

(d) No, because 448448 girls in 893893 births is far from what is expected, given the probability of having a girl or a boy.

Hire Me For All Your Tutoring Needs
Integrity-first tutoring: clear explanations, guidance, and feedback.
Drop an Email at
drjack9650@gmail.com
Chat Now And Get Quote