Academic Integrity: tutoring, explanations, and feedback — we don’t complete graded work or submit on a student’s behalf.

The deer count per square kilometer in three different ecological locations was

ID: 3322064 • Letter: T

Question

The deer count per square kilometer in three different ecological locations was recorded and is as follows: Location 1:30, 29, 20, 29 Location 2: 20, 58, 18, 22 Location 3: 5,7,4,9 Test to see if there is a difference in the mean deer per square kilometer in these different ecological locations using a 5% significance level. 0 A. The data provide sufficient evidence to conclude that there is a difference in the O B. The data provide sufficient evidence to conclude that there is no difference in the C. The data provide sufficient evidence to conclude that all the mean deer per 0 D. The data do not provide sufficient evidence to conclude that there is a difference mean deer per square kilometer in those locations. mean deer per square kilometer in those locations. square kilometer in those locations are different. in the mean deer per square kilometer in those locations. The data provide sufficient evidence to conclude that all the mean deer per square kilometer in those locations are different. 0 E. Click to select your answer line has po

Explanation / Answer

R-code:

l1=c(30,29,20,29)
l2=c(20,58,18,22)
l3=c(5,7,4,9)
d=stack(list("location1"=l1,"location2"=l2,"location3"=l3))
names(d)=c("values","location")
oneway.test(values~location,data=d,var.equal=TRUE)

output:

One-way analysis of means

data: values and location
F = 5.0047, num df = 2, denom df = 9, p-value = 0.03457

Since

p-value = 0.03457 < 0.05 , we reject H0 at 5% level of significance.

Hence, answer of this question is option A.

Hire Me For All Your Tutoring Needs
Integrity-first tutoring: clear explanations, guidance, and feedback.
Drop an Email at
drjack9650@gmail.com
Chat Now And Get Quote