Academic Integrity: tutoring, explanations, and feedback — we don’t complete graded work or submit on a student’s behalf.

Table 1 below provides a relative frequency distribution for (reported) violent

ID: 3313347 • Letter: T

Question

Table 1 below provides a relative frequency distribution for (reported) violent crimes in 1995. For instance, in 1995, 32.3% of violent crimes were robberies. A random sample of 500 violent-crime reports from last year yielded the frequency distribution shown in Table 2. The researcher was interested in determining if the data provide sufficient evidence to conclude that last year’s distribution of violent crimes has changed from the 1995 distribution. What test should be used?

                 Table 1                                                    Table 2

         Distribution of violent crimes                 Sample results for 500 randomly selected

          in the United States, 1995                               violent-crime reports last year

Type of

Violent Crime

Relative

Frequency

Type of

Violent Crime

Frequency

Murder

0.012

Murder

9

Forcible Rape

0.054

Forcible Rape

26

Robbery

0.323

Robbery

144

Agg. Assault

0.611

Agg. Assault

321

1.00

500

A) One-Factor ANOVA B) Two-Factor ANOVA C) Chi-Square test of Independence D) Chi-Square Goodness of Fit Test

Type of

Violent Crime

Relative

Frequency

Type of

Violent Crime

Frequency

Murder

0.012

Murder

9

Forcible Rape

0.054

Forcible Rape

26

Robbery

0.323

Robbery

144

Agg. Assault

0.611

Agg. Assault

321

1.00

500

Explanation / Answer

Since we need to test whether the distributions are same or it has changed, we will use Chi-Square Goodness of Fit Test.

Hence,

Option D is correct.