1. In NLRB v. Business Machine & Office Appliance Mechanics Conference Board, IU
ID: 330552 • Letter: 1
Question
1. In NLRB v. Business Machine & Office Appliance Mechanics Conference Board, IUE, Local 459 [Royal Typewriter Co.], there was a labor dispute between the Royal Typewriter Company and the Business Machine and Office Appliance Mechanics Conference Board, the certified bargaining agent of Royal’s typewriter mechanics and other service personnel. In this case, it was held that Section 8(b)(4) of the NLRA:
A. Held employers liable for damages
B. Prohibited National Labor Relation Board the jurisdiction to hear the matter
C. does not protect the employer
D. does not protect employees
2. The labor union of Rivet Metal Solutions threatened the employer with negative publicity if management failed to improve their wages and medical benefits. This is a violation of Section 8(b)(4) of the National Labor Relation Act and Rivet Metal Solutions may have remedy in the form of:
A. ?punitive damages.
B. liquidated damages.?
C. a warrant to arrest.?
D. an injunction.
A. ?punitive damages.
B. liquidated damages.?
C. a warrant to arrest.?
D. an injunction.
Explanation / Answer
1. B. In this case it was held that section 8 (b) (4) of NLRB that prohibited national relation labor board the juridiction to hear the matter.
2. d. this is a violation of section 8(b)(4)of the national labor relation act and rivet metal solution may have remedy in the form of an injunction. injunction is a legal remady imposed by the court
Related Questions
Navigate
Integrity-first tutoring: explanations and feedback only — we do not complete graded work. Learn more.