does performance depend on educational degree b. Does commitment depend on degre
ID: 3262928 • Letter: D
Question
does performance depend on educational degree
b. Does commitment depend on degree.
ANOVA
PERFORMANCE
Sum of Squares
df
Mean Square
F
Sig.
Between Groups
27.876
4
6.969
5.949
.000
Within Groups
92.541
79
1.171
Total
120.417
83
Multiple Comparisons
Dependent Variable: PERFORMANCE
Tukey HSD
(I) DEGREE
(J) DEGREE
Mean Difference (I-J)
Std. Error
Sig.
95% Confidence Interval
Lower Bound
Upper Bound
1
2
-1.084*
.353
.024
-2.07
-.10
3
-1.310*
.361
.005
-2.32
-.30
4
-1.191*
.357
.011
-2.19
-.19
5
-2.084*
.486
.000
-3.44
-.73
2
1
1.084*
.353
.024
.10
2.07
3
-.226
.343
.965
-1.18
.73
4
-.107
.338
.998
-1.05
.84
5
-1.000
.472
.223
-2.32
.32
3
1
1.310*
.361
.005
.30
2.32
2
.226
.343
.965
-.73
1.18
4
.118
.347
.997
-.85
1.09
5
-.774
.479
.490
-2.11
.56
4
1
1.191*
.357
.011
.19
2.19
2
.107
.338
.998
-.84
1.05
3
-.118
.347
.997
-1.09
.85
5
-.893
.475
.337
-2.22
.43
5
1
2.084*
.486
.000
.73
3.44
2
1.000
.472
.223
-.32
2.32
3
.774
.479
.490
-.56
2.11
4
.893
.475
.337
-.43
2.22
*. The mean difference is significant at the 0.05 level.
PERFORMANCE
Tukey HSDa,b
DEGREE
N
Subset for alpha = 0.05
1
2
1
17
2.06
2
21
3.14
3.14
4
20
3.25
3
19
3.37
5
7
4.14
Sig.
.068
.110
Means for groups in homogeneous subsets are displayed.
a. Uses Harmonic Mean Sample Size = 14.207.
b. The group sizes are unequal. The harmonic mean of the group sizes is used. Type I error levels are not guaranteed.
ANOVA
COMMITMENT_B
Sum of Squares
df
Mean Square
F
Sig.
Between Groups
2.971
4
.743
1.030
.397
Within Groups
56.982
79
.721
Total
59.952
83
Multiple Comparisons
Dependent Variable: COMMITMENT_B
Tukey HSD
(I) DEGREE
(J) DEGREE
Mean Difference (I-J)
Std. Error
Sig.
95% Confidence Interval
Lower Bound
Upper Bound
1
2
-.345
.277
.726
-1.12
.43
3
.099
.284
.997
-.69
.89
4
.041
.280
1.000
-.74
.82
5
-.345
.381
.895
-1.41
.72
2
1
.345
.277
.726
-.43
1.12
3
.444
.269
.471
-.31
1.19
4
.386
.265
.595
-.36
1.13
5
.000
.371
1.000
-1.03
1.03
3
1
-.099
.284
.997
-.89
.69
2
-.444
.269
.471
-1.19
.31
4
-.058
.272
1.000
-.82
.70
5
-.444
.376
.762
-1.49
.60
4
1
-.041
.280
1.000
-.82
.74
2
-.386
.265
.595
-1.13
.36
3
.058
.272
1.000
-.70
.82
5
-.386
.373
.839
-1.43
.66
5
1
.345
.381
.895
-.72
1.41
2
.000
.371
1.000
-1.03
1.03
3
.444
.376
.762
-.60
1.49
4
.386
.373
.839
-.66
1.43
COMMITMENT_B
Tukey HSDa,b
DEGREE
N
Subset for alpha = 0.05
1
3
19
3.84
4
20
3.90
1
17
3.94
2
21
4.29
5
7
4.29
Sig.
.634
Means for groups in homogeneous subsets are displayed.
a. Uses Harmonic Mean Sample Size = 14.207.
b. The group sizes are unequal. The harmonic mean of the group sizes is used. Type I error levels are not guaranteed.
ANOVA
PERFORMANCE
Sum of Squares
df
Mean Square
F
Sig.
Between Groups
27.876
4
6.969
5.949
.000
Within Groups
92.541
79
1.171
Total
120.417
83
Explanation / Answer
a)
Ho: there is no significant difference in the mean performance of different education degrees
H1: at least one of the mean performance of different education degrees differs significantly
With F = 5.949 and p-value < 0.05 I reject ho and conclude that at least one of the mean performance of different education degrees differs significantly
From turkey HSD I observe that with p-value < 0.05, degree (1,2)(1,3)(1,4)(1,5) differs significantly in their mean performance.
b)
Ho: there is no significant difference in the mean commitment_b of different education degrees
H1: at least one of the mean commitment_b of different education degrees differs significantly
With F = 1.030 and p-value > 0.05 I fail to reject ho and conclude that there is no significant difference in the mean commitment_b of different education degrees.
Related Questions
Navigate
Integrity-first tutoring: explanations and feedback only — we do not complete graded work. Learn more.